Connecticut House Bill HB06160

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/13
• Refer: 1/25/13
• Refer: 3/14/13
• Report Pass: 3/21/13
• Refer: 4/1/13
• Report Pass: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/16/13
• Report Pass: 4/17/13
• Engrossed: 5/23/13
• Report Pass: 5/27/13
• Chaptered: 6/20/13
• Enrolled: 6/26/13
• Passed: 7/11/13

Caption

An Act Requiring Working Smoke And Carbon Monoxide Detectors In Certain Residential Buildings At The Time Title Is Transferred.

Impact

The implications of HB 6160 are significant; it establishes a new standard that ties the sale of residential properties to critical safety requirements, which is expected to improve the overall safety of homes within the state. By requiring sellers to provide certification regarding the presence and functionality of these detectors, the law aims to reduce the risks of smoke inhalation and carbon monoxide poisoning—common hazards in residential buildings. Furthermore, any seller who fails to comply is subject to a financial penalty at closing, which reinforces the importance of adherence to this new regulation.

Summary

House Bill 6160 mandates that residential properties designed for single or two-family occupation must have functional smoke and carbon monoxide detectors before the title can be transferred. This legislation is aimed at enhancing public safety by ensuring that these vital safety devices are present and operational in homes at the time of sale. It specifically targets properties built prior to October 1, 2005, which historically may not have been equipped with such detectors. The bill establishes clear compliance protocols for property sellers and introduces penalties for non-compliance, designed to incentivize adherence to safety standards.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 6160 appears to be supportive, particularly among safety advocates and organizations focused on public health. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step toward protecting families and improving residential safety standards. However, there may be some concerns among real estate professionals about the potential administrative burdens and liabilities associated with ensuring compliance. Overall, the sentiment leans toward a recognition of the importance of safety, balanced with concerns regarding procedural implications.

Contention

While the intent of HB 6160 is clearly aligned with enhancing safety, points of contention may arise regarding enforcement, interpretations of 'working condition,' and what constitutes adequate compliance. Some stakeholders might argue that the requirements could impose additional costs on sellers and complicate real estate transactions, thus leading to a potential slowdown in housing market activity. Nevertheless, these concerns are often countered by the argument that the improved safety for residents justifies the measures introduced by the bill.