Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06356

Introduced
2/7/13  
Refer
2/7/13  
Report Pass
3/7/13  
Report Pass
3/7/13  
Report Pass
4/12/13  
Refer
4/25/13  
Report Pass
5/1/13  
Refer
5/7/13  
Report Pass
5/13/13  
Report Pass
5/13/13  
Engrossed
5/20/13  
Engrossed
5/20/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Benefit Corporations And Encouraging Social Enterprise.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6356 would amend existing laws to incorporate benefit corporations into the corporate landscape of Connecticut. This legislation encourages entrepreneurship that focuses not just on financial gain but also on advancing public welfare, improving community welfare, and preserving environmental health. By providing these entities a distinct legal status, the bill could foster a new wave of business models aimed at addressing social and environmental challenges, while still ensuring financial viability.

Summary

House Bill 6356 aims to establish a legal framework for benefit corporations in Connecticut, which are defined as businesses that pursue both profit and a general public benefit. The bill outlines the formation, governance, and operational requirements for benefit corporations, emphasizing their commitment to creating a positive impact on society and the environment. Importantly, benefit corporations are required to report annually on their performance regarding their public benefit goals, which sets them apart from traditional corporations focused solely on shareholder profits.

Sentiment

The reception of HB 6356 has been largely positive among proponents of social enterprise and advocates for corporate social responsibility. Supporters believe it aligns economic interests with ethical considerations, and fosters a corporate culture that values accountability and transparency. However, some concerns were raised regarding potential ambiguities in governance and the effectiveness of enforcement when it comes to achieving public benefit goals. The sentiment showcases a broader movement towards integrating social values into business practices.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the accountability mechanisms for benefit corporations and the definition of 'public benefit.' Critics worry about the lack of clarity in standards for measuring public benefits and how these standards will be enforced in practice. Furthermore, discussions highlighted the balance between ensuring corporate flexibility and preventing potential misuse of the benefit corporation status to avoid accountability for social performance. Overall, while the bill has strong support, there are valid concerns about its implementation and effectiveness.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00023

An Act Concerning Benefit Corporations And Encouraging Social Enterprise.

CT HB06667

An Act Concerning The Liability Of An Employer Who Disciplines Or Discharges An Employee On Account Of The Exercise Of Certain Constitutional Rights.

MS HB342

Mississippi Benefit Corporation Act; create.

CT HB05073

An Act Concerning Revisions To Connecticut's Model Entity Transactions Act And The Connecticut Business Corporation Act.

CT HB05490

An Act Concerning The Establishment Of Benefit Corporations.

CT HB07311

An Act Concerning Limited Liability Companies And Business Corporations.

LA HB408

Revises the business corporation laws (RE1 INCREASE SG EX See Note)

LA HB319

Provides for revisions to business corporation law