Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06453

Introduced
2/20/13  
Refer
2/20/13  
Report Pass
3/7/13  
Refer
3/18/13  
Report Pass
3/25/13  
Report Pass
3/25/13  
Refer
4/16/13  
Refer
4/16/13  
Report Pass
4/23/13  
Engrossed
5/2/13  
Report Pass
5/6/13  
Report Pass
5/6/13  
Chaptered
5/20/13  
Chaptered
5/20/13  
Enrolled
5/22/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Foamed-in-place Insulating Material.

Impact

The passage of HB 06453 will significantly impact state regulations regarding building materials, specifically targeting insulation standards. Manufacturers of foamed-in-place insulating materials must now adhere to a higher standard of testing and certification, which assures that their products do not emit harmful levels of formaldehyde. Compliance with current testing methodologies and certification requirements is expected to improve the overall safety for residents in buildings utilizing these materials, thus enhancing public health measures in construction practices.

Summary

House Bill 06453, also known as An Act Concerning Foamed-in-place Insulating Material, focuses on the regulation of certain types of insulation materials used in buildings. The bill prohibits the sale and installation of urea-formaldehyde foamed-in-place insulation in Connecticut unless manufacturers provide certification that their materials comply with strict new standards regarding formaldehyde emissions. The legislation aims to enhance public safety and indoor air quality by eliminating harmful insulation materials linked to health risks.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 06453 appears to be predominantly supportive, especially among health and safety advocates. Proponents argue that by regulating harmful materials, the state is taking a necessary step toward safeguarding occupants' health and promoting better environmental practices in construction. However, this sentiment is tempered by concerns from some manufacturers about increased costs and operational burdens that may arise from the new certification requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential economic implications for insulation manufacturers who may face increased compliance costs as they adapt to the new requirements outlined in the bill. Moreover, while the bill aims to resolve health concerns associated with formaldehyde emissions, some critics have raised concerns regarding the practical aspects of enforcing these new regulations and whether they may inadvertently limit the availability of certain insulation products in the market.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05248

An Act Concerning Foamed-in-place Insulating Material.

CA AB495

Cosmetics: safety.

NJ ACR144

Strongly urges DEP to adopt standards for certain drinking water contaminants as recommended by NJ Drinking Water Quality Institute.

NJ SCR123

Strongly urges DEP to adopt standards for certain drinking water contaminants as recommended by NJ Drinking Water Quality Institute.

NJ SCR44

Strongly urges DEP to adopt standards for certain drinking water contaminants as recommended by NJ Drinking Water Quality Institute.

LA HCR145

Requests a study and policy recommendations concerning the health effects of formaldehyde in children's personal care products at levels currently allowed by law

NJ A1775

Prohibits sale and distribution of nail products containing dibutyl phthalates, toluene, or formaldehyde.

NJ A162

Prohibits sale and distribution of nail products containing dibutyl phthalates, toluene, or formaldehyde.