Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06490

Introduced
2/25/13  
Refer
2/25/13  
Report Pass
4/4/13  
Report Pass
4/4/13  
Refer
4/9/13  
Refer
4/9/13  
Report Pass
4/16/13  
Engrossed
5/14/13  
Report Pass
5/16/13  
Report Pass
5/16/13  
Chaptered
6/20/13  
Enrolled
6/27/13  
Passed
7/12/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Grants In Lieu Of Taxes For Ledyard And Montville And Repealing A Deficit Reporting Requirement.

Impact

The bill is set to repeal a prior requirement for revaluation of real property designated within certain settlement boundaries held in trust by federal authorities for the tribes. This change is anticipated to simplify the assessment processes for these properties starting from October 1, 2013. Local governments in Ledyard and Montville will potentially see adjustments in their financial planning and budgeting as these changes could affect property taxation revenues closely tied to their operational capacities. Accordingly, the resolution of these tax arrangements aims to provide clearer financial frameworks for both the state and tribal governments involved.

Summary

House Bill 6490, also known as 'An Act Concerning Grants In Lieu Of Taxes For Ledyard And Montville', addresses the fiscal arrangements and funding mechanisms for local governments in Ledyard and Montville, particularly in regard to properties held in trust by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation and the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut. By altering the tax structures associated with these properties, the bill seeks to clarify the jurisdictions and responsibilities of local and tribal governments concerning property assessments. It reflects a nuanced approach towards taxation policies that impact localities with significant tribal land holdings.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 6490 appears to lean positively, as it can be regarded as a measure that aims to enhance local financial stability while providing clarity on intergovernmental fiscal relations. By addressing issues of taxation in relation to tribal land, supporters of the bill argue that it fosters a sense of cooperation between state and local entities as well as tribal authorities. However, skepticism may arise from those who remain cautious about potential long-term implications on local revenue sources and their dependence on tribal-related properties.

Contention

Notably, discussions surrounding the bill may touch upon the balance of power and financial responsibilities between state and local governments and tribal authorities. As the revisions to property tax obligations come into play, there could be concerns about how effectively local entities will adapt to these changes, especially in terms of expected funding from grants in lieu of taxes. This bill highlights important themes around local governance, fiscal responsibilities, and the unique circumstances facing towns with significant tribal lands.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.