Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06492

Introduced
2/26/13  
Refer
2/26/13  
Refer
2/26/13  
Report Pass
3/27/13  
Report Pass
3/27/13  
Refer
4/8/13  
Refer
4/8/13  
Report Pass
4/15/13  
Report Pass
4/15/13  
Engrossed
5/8/13  
Engrossed
5/8/13  
Report Pass
5/10/13  
Report Pass
5/10/13  
Chaptered
6/20/13  
Chaptered
6/20/13  
Enrolled
6/27/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Confidentiality Of Employees Supplying Information To The Auditors Of Public Accounts.

Impact

The passage of HB 6492 is designed to amend existing laws related to the auditing processes performed by the Auditors of Public Accounts. Specifically, it will enforce stricter confidentiality requirements concerning individuals who provide information relevant to audits. The impact of this bill will ensure that those whistleblowers can supply information without jeopardizing their own employment or safety, thereby encouraging a culture of reporting potential fraud or mismanagement in state-funded industries.

Summary

House Bill 6492, known as the Act Concerning The Confidentiality Of Employees Supplying Information To The Auditors Of Public Accounts, seeks to protect the identities of employees who report on unauthorized or illegal actions concerning state funds. The legislation aims to strengthen the auditing process by ensuring that employees can disclose concerns without fear of retaliation or exposure. By doing this, the bill aims to promote transparency and accountability within governmental agencies and public accounts.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 6492 appears to be supportive, particularly among those advocating for greater transparency in government operations. Supporters express optimism that with enhanced protective measures for whistleblowers, the state's financial integrity can be better safeguarded. However, there may also be some concerns voiced by critics who fear that overemphasis on confidentiality could result in a lack of transparency in the auditing process itself.

Contention

One notable point of contention emerged regarding how the balance between confidentiality and transparency should be handled. Opponents of strict confidentiality measures argue that while it is important to protect informants, it is equally crucial to maintain public access to information regarding government audits. The challenge lies in finding an equitable solution that protects individuals while still upholding the necessary transparency for public trust.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.