Connecticut House Bill HB06597

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/13
• Refer: 3/6/13
• Report Pass: 3/21/13
• Refer: 3/28/13
• Report Pass: 4/4/13
• Refer: 4/16/13
• Report Pass: 4/22/13

Caption

An Act Creating The Civilian Medal Of Honor.

Impact

The enactment of HB 6597 will implement a formalized process for recognizing civilian bravery, which may foster a greater sense of community and encourage individuals to engage in acts of heroism. The bill establishes a selection board for reviewing nominations, which consists of various appointed members from both legislative chambers and executive appointees. This structured approach ensures that recognition is not only merit-based but also inclusive of diverse viewpoints from different political factions within the state government.

Summary

House Bill 6597 establishes the framework for the creation of the Civilian Medal of Honor, which recognizes citizens who demonstrate valorous and heroic deeds in the service of their community or the state. The bill empowers the Commissioner of Emergency Services and Public Protection to award this medal directly or posthumously to individuals who have performed significant acts in saving lives or who have faced threats of injury or death in such efforts. This initiative is intended to honor those who contribute to the safety and welfare of others through courageous actions.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 6597 appears to be supportive, as it aligns with broader community values of heroism and public service. Legislators and public safety officials expressed enthusiasm for formally acknowledging the contributions of civilians who risk their lives for others. Such public recognition is seen as an important motivator that could inspire further altruistic behavior within communities. Overall, the sentiment is one of admiration and appreciation for civic responsibility and bravery.

Contention

While there seems to be a consensus on the need for recognizing acts of bravery, potential points of contention may arise regarding the criteria for nominations and the selection process managed by the appointed board. There might be discussions about how inclusivity and fairness will be ensured in the selection process, as well as whether the criteria adequately reflect the values of different communities. Moreover, the bill's implementation may require ongoing oversight to adapt to any emerging issues related to its administration and the impact of the awards on community dynamics.