Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06631

Introduced
3/12/13  
Introduced
3/12/13  
Refer
3/12/13  
Refer
3/12/13  
Report Pass
3/27/13  
Report Pass
3/27/13  
Refer
4/8/13  
Refer
4/8/13  
Report Pass
4/15/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Order Of Parties On Ballots.

Impact

The introduction of this bill is expected to simplify the voting process by providing a clear structure for how parties are represented on ballots. By having the governing party listed first, proponents of the bill argue that it may enhance their visibility and potentially increase down-ballot voting for those parties. Moreover, this change could affect how political parties strategize their campaigning efforts, given the new hierarchy on ballots that could have implications for voter recognition and engagement.

Summary

House Bill 06631 aims to reform the order of political party names displayed on ballots during elections, specifically for the state of Connecticut. The bill stipulates that the party of the candidate who received the highest votes in the last gubernatorial election will be listed first. This is followed by other parties in descending order based on their received votes for the governor. Minor parties with no candidates for governor will appear next, followed by petitioning candidates sorted by their party designation. This change is designed to standardize the ballot presentation, which might influence voter perception and decision-making on election day.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards HB 06631 appears mixed, with some legislative members supporting the measure as a means to create clarity for voters. Advocates believe that a uniform ballot design will lessen confusion and aid in a more straightforward voting process. Conversely, opponents might argue that this could unfairly advantage larger parties at the expense of smaller or newly established ones, potentially stifling the diversity of political representation and undermining the principles of equitable electoral competition.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the implications for minor and petitioning parties. Critics of the bill express concern that by prioritizing parties based on prior gubernatorial success, it diminishes the opportunities for minor parties to gain traction with voters who may not be familiar with them. Additionally, there is an argument about how this bill aligns with the principle of ensuring fair chances for all parties in the election process, especially those that may not have a strong historical voting base.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05311

An Act Concerning The Counting Of Absentee Ballots.

CT HB05498

An Act Concerning Election Security And Transparency, The Counting Of Absentee Ballots, Absentee Voting For Certain Patients Of Nursing Homes, Security Of Certain Election Workers, State Elections Enforcement Commission Complaints, Ballots Made Available In Languages Other Than English And Various Other Revisions Related To Election Administration.

CT SB00257

An Act Concerning Certification Of And Casting Of Ballots By Presidential Electors.

CT SB00263

An Act Concerning Citizens' Election Program Grants For Court-ordered Primaries And Elections And Funding.

CT HB05309

An Act Concerning Ballots Made Available In Languages Other Than English.

CT SB00354

An Act Concerning Rules Of Minor Political Parties.

CT SB00258

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Minor And Technical Revisions To The Government Administration And Elections Statutes.

CT SB00254

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Risk-limiting Audits Working Group.

CT SB00262

An Act Concerning Municipal Campaign Finance Filings.

CT SB00390

An Act Concerning Penalties For Certain Election Crimes.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.