Connecticut House Bill HB06637

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/13
• Refer: 3/12/13
• Report Pass: 4/12/13
• Refer: 4/25/13
• Report Pass: 5/1/13
• Refer: 5/7/13
• Report Pass: 5/14/13
• Engrossed: 6/3/13
• Report Pass: 6/4/13

Caption

An Act Concerning The Discontinuance Of Highways And Private Ways By Municipalities.

Impact

The enactment of HB 6637 would primarily impact the statutory framework guiding municipal land use and road management in Connecticut. By granting selectmen more direct control over the discontinuation of highways and private ways, the bill is seen as a tool for optimizing local government operations. However, it places a significant responsibility on selectmen, requiring them to balance community needs with the preservation of public rights of way.

Summary

House Bill 6637 aims to modify the process by which municipalities in Connecticut can discontinue highways and private ways. Under the proposed legislation, the selectmen of any town would have the authority to discontinue a highway or pathway, either in its entirety or partially, subject to a majority vote at a town meeting. This bill seeks to streamline the administrative procedures related to the discontinuation of less utilized highways and enhance local governance in managing public pathways.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 6637 appears to be supportive, particularly among local government officials who favor increased autonomy and local decision-making capabilities. Advocates argue that simplifying the process of highway discontinuance allows municipalities to make informed choices about local infrastructure without unnecessary state intervention. However, some critics voice concerns about potential overreach and emphasize the need for checks and balances to protect residents' interests.

Contention

One notable point of contention involves concerns regarding the potential implications for property owners adjacent to highways being discontinued. Opponents argue that although the bill seeks to simplify procedures, it may inadvertently complicate access for some residents or lead to disputes over land usage rights. Thus, the bill's effects could significantly shape land management practices at the municipal level and highlight the need for transparency and community input in such decisions.