Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06663

Introduced
3/15/13  
Refer
3/15/13  
Report Pass
4/12/13  
Report Pass
4/12/13  
Refer
4/25/13  
Refer
4/25/13  
Report Pass
5/1/13  
Refer
5/7/13  
Report Pass
5/13/13  
Report Pass
5/13/13  
Engrossed
5/15/13  
Engrossed
5/15/13  
Report Pass
5/17/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Complaints Alleging Misconduct By Law Enforcement Agency Personnel.

Impact

The bill's implementation would have a significant impact on state laws regarding police conduct and citizen engagement. By requiring law enforcement agencies to publicly disclose their policies and ensure accessibility to community members, it promotes a more transparent process in addressing citizen concerns. This could lead to improved trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve. Furthermore, with the standardized handling of misconduct complaints, agencies may see a reduction in the inconsistencies that currently exist across different jurisdictions, thereby enhancing overall accountability.

Summary

House Bill 6663 aims to enhance accountability and transparency within law enforcement agencies by establishing a standardized policy for the acceptance and investigation of misconduct complaints made by the public. By mandating that the Police Officer Standards and Training Council develop and implement such a policy, the bill seeks to ensure that all law enforcement personnel are held accountable for their actions. The policy will require each law enforcement agency to adopt protocols for managing complaints, including processes for anonymous submissions and protections against retaliation for complainants.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 6663 appears to lean towards support among legislators, as the bill emphasizes accountability and the protection of citizens' rights within the context of law enforcement. Supporters advocate that such measures are essential for promoting fair policing practices. However, there may be some contention regarding the specifics of the implementation, particularly in how the standardized forms and investigation protocols are developed and enforced, which could affect agency resources and operations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential burden on law enforcement resources to handle the administrative changes required by the bill. Opponents may argue that while promoting transparency is critical, the implementation of these new policies could divert focus and resources from active policing and crime prevention. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of anonymous complaints and how they would be handled fairly are also likely areas of debate, highlighting a balance between accountability and operational efficiency within law enforcement agencies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2713

Public employment: sexual harassment tracking.

CA SB342

Misleading advertising: domain and subdomain names.

CA SB820

Cannabis: enforcement: seizure of property.

CA SB1485

Consumer complaints.

CA AB2948

Consumer protection: Department of Consumer Affairs: complaints.

CA AB424

Alcohol and other drug programs: complaints.

CA AB1679

Motor vehicle insurance: auto body repair.

HI HB165

Relating To Internal Complaint Procedures.