| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 127 | |
| 2 | 2 | January Session, 2013 LCO No. 696 | |
| 3 | 3 | Referred to Committee on PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | |
| 4 | 4 | Introduced by: | |
| 5 | 5 | SEN. DOYLE, 9th Dist. SEN. FONFARA, 1st Dist. REP. GUERRERA, 29th Dist. REP. MORIN, 28th Dist. | |
| 6 | 6 | ||
| 7 | 7 | General Assembly | |
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | 9 | Proposed Bill No. 127 | |
| 10 | 10 | ||
| 11 | 11 | January Session, 2013 | |
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 13 | LCO No. 696 | |
| 14 | 14 | ||
| 15 | 15 | Referred to Committee on PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | |
| 16 | 16 | ||
| 17 | 17 | Introduced by: | |
| 18 | 18 | ||
| 19 | 19 | SEN. DOYLE, 9th Dist. | |
| 20 | 20 | ||
| 21 | 21 | SEN. FONFARA, 1st Dist. | |
| 22 | 22 | ||
| 23 | 23 | REP. GUERRERA, 29th Dist. | |
| 24 | 24 | ||
| 25 | 25 | REP. MORIN, 28th Dist. | |
| 26 | 26 | ||
| 27 | 27 | AN ACT CONCERNING MUNICIPAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR NON-PROFIT CONNECTICUT ELK LODGES. | |
| 28 | 28 | ||
| 29 | 29 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: | |
| 30 | 30 | ||
| 31 | 31 | That the general statutes be amended to authorize municipalities, at their option, to exempt any local Elks Lodge from the payment of real property taxes. | |
| 32 | 32 | ||
| 33 | 33 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 34 | 34 | ||
| 35 | 35 | To authorize a local option property tax exemption for Elks lodges. |