Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00196

Introduced
1/18/13  
Introduced
1/18/13  
Refer
1/18/13  
Refer
3/12/13  
Report Pass
3/12/13  
Refer
3/19/13  
Report Pass
3/26/13  
Refer
4/12/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Credit Blocks.

Impact

The enactment of SB00196 is expected to have a significant impact on retail practices in the state, particularly those that involve payment processing. By restricting the ability of retailers to place credit blocks, the law will provide consumers with greater control over their finances and reduce the incidence of unexpected charges that can lead to overdraft fees or other financial complications. This change is not only aimed at fostering a fairer transaction environment but also at enhancing consumer trust in the payment process.

Summary

SB00196, titled An Act Concerning Credit Blocks, addresses the practice of retailers placing 'credit blocks' on consumers' debit and credit card transactions without their knowledge and consent. The bill prohibits any retail business from reserving a specified dollar amount of a customer's purchasing capacity unless the customer has been informed and has agreed to such a block. This measure aims to enhance consumer protection by ensuring transparency in transactions and preventing retailers from imposing unnecessary financial encumbrances on consumers during the purchase process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00196 appears to be predominantly supportive among consumer advocacy groups and individuals concerned with financial transparency. On the other hand, some retailers may express concerns regarding possible limitations on their operational flexibility. Overall, the discussions in the legislative context suggest a general consensus on the need for improved consumer protections in financial transactions, particularly given the growing reliance on electronic payments.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB00196 concern how it might affect the relationship between retailers and their payment processing partners. Some retailers may argue that the bill could hinder their ability to manage transaction risks or enforce policies designed to protect both the retailer and the consumer. Additionally, while the intent is to protect consumers, critics may raise concerns about potential unintended consequences on pricing and service availability, which could impact certain market dynamics.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.