Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00459

Introduced
1/23/13  
Refer
1/23/13  
Refer
3/8/13  
Report Pass
3/22/13  
Report Pass
3/22/13  
Refer
4/2/13  
Refer
4/2/13  
Report Pass
4/9/13  
Report Pass
4/9/13  
Refer
4/18/13  
Refer
4/18/13  
Report Pass
4/23/13  
Report Pass
4/23/13  
Report Pass
4/25/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Local Control Over Coastal Areas.

Impact

If enacted, SB00459 could significantly impact zoning regulations and local control over coastal areas in the state. By allowing exemptions for specific minor activities and constructions, the bill aims to alleviate burdens on local governments and homeowners, facilitating quicker and easier development processes. However, the bill also retains necessary protections for environmentally sensitive regions, ensuring that critical habitats and resources are maintained despite the relaxed regulations for minor structures.

Summary

SB00459, titled 'An Act Concerning Local Control Over Coastal Areas', aims to amend existing statutes related to coastal site plan review requirements and the regulation of structures and activities within coastal zones. The bill seeks to exempt certain minor constructions, such as single-family homes, decks, and structures used for maintaining residential properties, from coastal site plan reviews. The objective is to streamline processes for homeowners and local authorities while still preserving essential environmental protections in coastal regions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00459 appears to be mixed. Proponents of the bill argue that it simplifies regulatory processes, benefiting the local economy and encouraging development in coastal communities. They highlight the need for local flexibility in addressing community-specific needs. On the other hand, opponents express concern that the bill may undermine important environmental protections, leading to potential negative impacts on coastal ecosystems and wildlife. This indicates a tension between the desire for local control and environmental stewardship.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the debate over the balance between local development and environmental integrity. Critics argue that by relaxing certain permit requirements for structures near sensitive coastal areas, SB00459 could foster overdevelopment and harm marine ecosystems. Supporters counter that the bill’s provisions ensure that significant projects still require permits and oversight, aiming to find a middle ground that addresses local priorities without compromising environmental health.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S3636

Requires cyclical inspection of parking structures.

CA AB2772

California Rent Relief Program.

LA SB193

Enacts the Louisiana Structured Settlement Protection Act. (7/1/20)

CA AB2263

Designated historical resource: conversion or adaptation: required parking.

CA AB2344

Housing: affordable and market rate units.

NC S655

Update Structured Settlement Protection Act

NC H845

Update Structured Settlement Protection Act

NJ A5221

Requires DCA to review and amend State Uniform Construction Code concerning parking structures to address increased weight of electric vehicles.