Connecticut Senate Bill SB00564

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/13
• Refer: 1/24/13
• Report Pass: 3/4/13
• Refer: 3/14/13
• Report Pass: 3/20/13
• Engrossed: 5/8/13
• Report Pass: 5/9/13
• Chaptered: 5/22/13
• Enrolled: 5/29/13
• Passed: 6/3/13

Caption

An Act Concerning Mercury Emissions Testing At Certain Power Plants.

Impact

The legislative framework introduced by SB 00564 aims to enhance monitoring and compliance regarding mercury emissions from coal-burning power plants. It provides a process for establishing alternative emissions limits, allowing for adjustments based on technological capabilities and new data. As a result, the bill could lead to stricter oversight of mercury emissions, compelling plant operators to adopt more effective pollution control technologies. This might also impact the long-term regulatory environment as the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection is required to conduct regular reviews of emissions limits and may impose even stricter standards as necessary.

Summary

Senate Bill 00564, titled 'An Act Concerning Mercury Emissions Testing At Certain Power Plants,' sets forth new regulations regarding the emission of mercury from facilities that generate electricity using coal. The bill requires operators of affected units—power plants using coal as a significant fuel source—to meet stringent mercury emissions rates. Specifically, it mandates an emissions limit of no more than 0.6 pounds of mercury per trillion BTU of heat input or a 90% reduction from inlet conditions, whichever is more achievable. These standards are intended to minimize environmental and public health risks associated with mercury pollution.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 00564 appears largely supportive, particularly among environmental advocacy groups and public health officials, who view the legislation as a critical step toward reducing hazardous emissions and protecting communities. However, there could be concerns among power plant operators regarding the financial and operational impacts of complying with the more rigorous standards. Discussions around the bill highlight a balance between protecting public health and the economic implications for the energy sector, reflecting a nuanced view on regulatory approaches to environmental issues.

Contention

While the bill received broad support leading to its passage, contention may arise in the implementation phase. Power plant operators might argue against the costs associated with upgrades to emissions control technology and compliance monitoring. Additionally, there may be debates over the feasibility of meeting the established emissions limits, especially for older plants that may require significant investment for upgrades. The effectiveness of the bill will largely depend on regulatory enforcement and the ability of facilities to adapt to the new standards without jeopardizing energy production.