Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00599

Introduced
1/24/13  
Refer
1/24/13  
Refer
1/24/13  
Report Pass
2/5/13  
Refer
2/15/13  
Report Pass
2/22/13  
Report Pass
2/22/13  
Engrossed
4/24/13  
Engrossed
4/24/13  
Report Pass
4/25/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Dispensation And Insurance Coverage Of A Prescribed Drug During Review Of An Adverse Determination Or A Final Adverse Determination.

Impact

The approval of SB00599 would significantly impact state healthcare laws by reinforcing the rights of patients in their interactions with health insurance providers. Effective October 1, 2013, the law would amend current statutes regarding insurance coverage and patients' rights to appeal adverse decisions. This bill aims to create a safety net for patients, ensuring they are not left without vital medications while navigating the complexities of their insurance coverage appeals. Practically, this could lead to enhanced compliance from health carriers with regards to timely grievance processing and patient care standards.

Summary

SB00599, titled 'An Act Concerning Dispensation And Insurance Coverage Of A Prescribed Drug During Review Of An Adverse Determination Or A Final Adverse Determination', focuses on ensuring that patients continue to receive their prescribed medications during the review process of any adverse decisions made by their health insurers. If a patient or their representative files a grievance regarding the denial of medication, the bill mandates that the insurance company provide immediate electronic authorization to the pharmacy for a sufficient supply of the medication during the grievance period. The goal is to minimize disruptions in a patient's access to necessary medications while they challenge an adverse determination from their insurer.

Contention

During discussions regarding SB00599, key points of contention revolved around the implications of imposing immediate obligations on health insurers. Supporters argued that such measures are critical for patient safety and wellbeing, preventing delays that could result in adverse health outcomes. However, opponents expressed concerns about the potential for increased costs for insurance companies and how these might be managed. Additionally, there was debate over whether the bill might lead to unintended consequences, such as an overuse of medications while grievances are processed, potentially affecting overall healthcare costs within the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.