Connecticut Senate Bill SB00678

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/13
• Refer: 1/25/13

Caption

An Act Revising The Earned Risk Reduction Credit Program.

Impact

The proposed amendments to the earned risk reduction credit program are designed to prevent individuals convicted of specific serious offenses from benefiting from early release credits. This change is expected to impact the overall incarceration policy within the state, as it could lead to longer sentences for certain individuals. The Commissioner of Correction is also mandated to conduct a review of the program and propose additional methods for strengthening it in alignment with public safety concerns, a move that indicates an increased focus on rehabilitation alongside safety.

Summary

SB00678, an Act Revising The Earned Risk Reduction Credit Program, seeks to amend existing state laws governing the earned risk reduction credit program for inmates. The bill proposes to immediately suspend the current iteration of the program and incorporate changes aimed at enhancing public safety. Central to the revisions is the indication that inmates convicted of certain offenses will no longer be eligible to earn credits through this program, which had previously allowed for risk reduction credits to be awarded for good behavior and participation in rehabilitation programs.

Contention

There is a notable discourse surrounding SB00678 regarding the balance between rehabilitation and public safety. Proponents of the bill argue that these amendments are necessary to mitigate risks associated with releasing prisoners who have serious offenses on their records. However, opponents might contend that such restrictions could disincentivize positive behavior among inmates and undermine rehabilitation efforts. The requirement for the Commissioner to report on potential improvements to the program signals an acknowledgment of the need to address these complex issues.

Final_notes

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, the discussions that ensue will likely highlight differing philosophies on criminal justice reform, weighing the importance of public safety against the potential benefits of rehabilitation and reintegration for offenders. The scrutiny on this bill reflects broader societal views on justice and punishment.