Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | - | General Assembly Committee Bill No. 735 | |
2 | - | January Session, 2013 LCO No. 4902 | |
3 | - | *04902SB00735JUD* | |
1 | + | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 735 | |
2 | + | January Session, 2013 LCO No. 2052 | |
4 | 3 | Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY | |
5 | 4 | Introduced by: | |
6 | - | ||
5 | + | SEN. FASANO, 34th Dist. SEN. MCKINNEY, 28th Dist. | |
7 | 6 | ||
8 | 7 | General Assembly | |
9 | 8 | ||
10 | - | ||
9 | + | Proposed Bill No. 735 | |
11 | 10 | ||
12 | 11 | January Session, 2013 | |
13 | 12 | ||
14 | - | LCO No. 4902 | |
15 | - | ||
16 | - | *04902SB00735JUD* | |
13 | + | LCO No. 2052 | |
17 | 14 | ||
18 | 15 | Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY | |
19 | 16 | ||
20 | 17 | Introduced by: | |
21 | 18 | ||
22 | - | (JUD) | |
19 | + | SEN. FASANO, 34th Dist. | |
20 | + | ||
21 | + | SEN. MCKINNEY, 28th Dist. | |
23 | 22 | ||
24 | 23 | AN ACT CONCERNING ACTIONS AGAINST SCHOOL SECURITY CONSULTANTS. | |
25 | 24 | ||
26 | 25 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: | |
27 | 26 | ||
28 | - | Section 1. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2013) Any person who is hired by a local or regional board of education, state charter school or regional educational service center as a school security consultant and who designs a security plan for a school or the school district shall be immune from civil liability for damage or injury occurring on or after October 1, 2013, resulting from any act, error or omission by such person with respect to the design of such school security plan or school district security plan, unless such damage or injury was caused by the reckless, wilful or wanton misconduct of such person. | |
29 | - | ||
30 | - | ||
31 | - | ||
32 | - | ||
33 | - | This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections: | |
34 | - | Section 1 October 1, 2013 New section | |
35 | - | ||
36 | - | This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections: | |
37 | - | ||
38 | - | Section 1 | |
39 | - | ||
40 | - | October 1, 2013 | |
41 | - | ||
42 | - | New section | |
27 | + | That the general statutes be amended to hold harmless any school security consultant and provide such school security consultant with a special defense against any action for damages arising out of a school security plan or design created by such school security consultant for a school or school district. | |
43 | 28 | ||
44 | 29 | Statement of Purpose: | |
45 | 30 | ||
46 | - | To provide immunity for school security consultants and encourage the hiring of such school security consultants. | |
47 | - | ||
48 | - | [Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets. Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] | |
49 | - | ||
50 | - | ||
51 | - | ||
52 | - | Co-Sponsors: SEN. FASANO, 34th Dist.; SEN. MCKINNEY, 28th Dist. | |
53 | - | ||
54 | - | Co-Sponsors: | |
55 | - | ||
56 | - | SEN. FASANO, 34th Dist.; SEN. MCKINNEY, 28th Dist. | |
57 | - | ||
58 | - | S.B. 735 | |
31 | + | To encourage the hiring of professional school security consultants. |