Connecticut Senate Bill SB00806

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/13
• Refer: 1/31/13
• Report Pass: 3/18/13
• Refer: 3/28/13
• Report Pass: 4/4/13
• Refer: 4/12/13
• Report Pass: 4/15/13
• Report Pass: 4/16/13
• Engrossed: 4/24/13
• Report Pass: 4/25/13
• Chaptered: 5/22/13
• Enrolled: 5/29/13
• Passed: 6/3/13

Caption

An Act Concerning The Municipal Purchase Of Development Rights For Agricultural Land Preservation.

Impact

If enacted, SB00806 would modify existing statutes regarding the management of agricultural land preservation. It allows municipalities greater flexibility in acquiring development rights, which could lead to more effective land use policies that support both environmental sustainability and economic interests. As more municipalities embrace this capability, it may lead to enhanced coordination in land use strategies and promoting agriculture as a part of local economies. Overall, the bill aims to provide necessary tools for municipalities to act decisively in preserving local agricultural heritage.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 806 seeks to enhance local governmental ability to preserve agricultural land by allowing municipalities to purchase development rights. This act is intended to support initiatives aimed at preventing the conversion of farmland into urban development. By securing the rights to agricultural land, municipalities can maintain local agricultural practices while promoting sustainable development. The legislation enables local authorities to leverage funds for purchasing development rights, provided the landowners voluntarily offer their rights and the land is earmarked for preservation through existing municipal plans.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00806 appears to be largely positive among agricultural and environmental advocates, who see it as an essential step toward sustainable land use. Many supporters applaud the potential for better stewardship of agricultural resources and enhanced local governance in land management matters. However, there may also be concerns from some property rights advocates who fear that the increased municipal control over development rights could infringe on individual property rights. The overall discussion seems to reflect a balanced perspective on the necessity of finding harmony between conservation efforts and property rights.

Contention

While SB00806 is generally well-received, a notable point of contention includes how the acquisition of development rights might impact individual property owners and their rights to decide the use of their lands. Some critics could argue that while the bill focuses on preservation, it may inadvertently limit the options available to landowners such as constructing residences or farm structures on their land. Therefore, discussions may revolve around the need for safeguards that protect property rights while still achieving the goal of agricultural land preservation.