Connecticut Senate Bill SB00897

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/15/13
• Refer: 2/15/13
• Report Pass: 3/19/13
• Refer: 3/28/13
• Report Pass: 4/4/13

Caption

An Act Concerning Regulation Of Firearms.

Impact

The proposed legislation would amend several sections of existing firearm laws, introducing higher penalties for violations related to carrying firearms under the influence. This aligns with national efforts to reduce firearm-related incidents, particularly those involving intoxication. The stipulations for sales and transfers of firearms are intended to ensure that law enforcement remains informed and capable of intervening should illegal activity be suspected, thereby increasing overall public safety throughout the state.

Summary

SB00897 aims to strengthen the regulation of firearms within the state by instituting stricter controls on the purchase and possession of firearms. The bill outlines specific prohibitions against carrying loaded firearms while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, thus aligning penalties with public safety initiatives. It also mandates that sales and transfers of firearms must comply with additional documentation and notification protocols to law enforcement agencies, enhancing tracking and accountability in firearm transactions.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB00897 appears to reflect a heightened concern for public safety among lawmakers and constituents, particularly in light of recent discussions around gun violence. Supporters of the bill argue that it will protect communities from potential dangers posed by firearms in the hands of individuals who are under the influence of substances. However, there is also a segment of the public that views this legislation as overly restrictive, raising concerns about personal freedoms and potential overreach in regulating lawful gun ownership.

Contention

Notable points of contention stem from the balance between safety and personal rights. Critics of the bill, particularly from advocacy groups focused on Second Amendment rights, argue that the stricter regulations may unfairly penalize responsible gun owners and complicate legal activities such as hunting. There is concern that local enforcement of these regulations could lead to uneven application of the law, creating friction between different interpretations of responsible gun ownership across various communities.