Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01002

Introduced
2/27/13  
Refer
2/27/13  
Report Pass
3/22/13  
Refer
4/5/13  
Report Pass
4/11/13  
Report Pass
4/11/13  
Engrossed
4/24/13  
Report Pass
4/25/13  
Report Pass
4/25/13  
Chaptered
5/28/13  
Chaptered
5/28/13  
Enrolled
5/29/13  
Enrolled
5/29/13  
Passed
6/3/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Community Schools.

Impact

The potential impact of SB01002 on state laws is significant, especially regarding how local governments manage regulations pertaining to businesses operating within their jurisdictions. It aims to centralize certain regulatory authorities at the state level, diminishing the powers of municipalities to enforce their own rules that conflict with state standards. This shift could alter the landscape of local governance, especially in areas such as labor laws, public health, and safety protocols, which have historically been tailored to meet the specific needs of localities.

Summary

SB01002 seeks to address the economic challenges in the state by modifying existing laws governing business regulations and local government powers. The bill proposes measures that are intended to streamline business operations and enhance economic growth by reducing bureaucratic obstacles that companies face at the local level. Proponents argue that a more uniform approach to regulation across different jurisdictions will foster a more conducive environment for business ventures, ultimately benefiting the state's economy as a whole.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01002 is mixed, with clear divisions among stakeholders. Business associations and proponents of the bill have expressed strong support, citing the need for reducing regulatory burdens as essential for economic recovery and growth. In contrast, some local officials and community advocates have voiced their discontent, arguing that the bill undermines the autonomy of local governments and could lead to one-size-fits-all regulations that do not adequately address local concerns. The discussions indicate a broader debate over the balance between state oversight and local governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's implications for public safety and community welfare. Critics have raised concerns that diminishing local regulatory power could compromise public health initiatives and zoning laws tailored to community needs. Additionally, the potential for reduced oversight on businesses raises alarms about the capacity for local authorities to respond flexibly to emerging challenges within their regions. As the bill progresses, these contentious issues are likely to remain at the forefront of legislative discussions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TN SB0901

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49, relative to school performance.

TN HB1373

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49, relative to school performance.

TN HB0877

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49, Chapter 6, relative to school performance.

CA AB55

Hazardous materials management: stationary sources.

CT HB05551

An Act Concerning The Commissioner's Network Of Schools.

KY HB298

AN ACT relating to schools identified for comprehensive support and improvement in schools.

CA SB842

Energy: petroleum refinery turnaround and maintenance.

CA AB3258

Refinery and chemical plants.