Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01003

Introduced
2/27/13  
Refer
2/27/13  
Refer
2/27/13  
Report Pass
3/21/13  
Refer
4/1/13  
Report Pass
4/8/13  
Refer
4/18/13  
Report Pass
4/23/13  
Report Pass
4/23/13  
Report Pass
4/24/13  
Report Pass
4/24/13  
Engrossed
5/14/13  
Engrossed
5/14/13  
Report Pass
5/15/13  
Report Pass
5/15/13  
Chaptered
6/6/13  
Chaptered
6/6/13  
Enrolled
6/10/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Secondhand Dealers.

Impact

The implications of SB01003 are significant as it establishes stricter guidelines and definitions for the selling of secondhand goods, ultimately enhancing consumer protections. By clearly outlining the roles of secondhand dealers and exempting certain types of businesses from this definition, the bill aims to streamline regulatory processes and ensure compliance. This action could help balance the need for consumer safeguards with the operational realities faced by secondhand dealers. Consequently, local economies that rely on secondhand markets may benefit from clearer practices and enhanced trust from consumers.

Summary

SB01003, known as the Act Concerning Secondhand Dealers, aims to revise the legislative framework governing secondhand businesses in the state. The bill redefines key terms related to secondhand dealers, pawnbrokers, and other forms of retail businesses that sell used goods. Specific definitions are expanded to clarify the roles and responsibilities of various dealers and the products they deal with, promoting better understanding and compliance among those involved in the secondhand merchandise market. This amendment is set to take effect on October 1, 2013, indicating a timely intervention in legislative updates to match evolving business practices.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB01003 appears to be supportive among business owners and consumer protection advocates who see the necessity for clearer regulations in the secondhand goods market. However, some dissent may arise from those concerned about the potential for increased regulatory burden on small businesses operating within this space. The balance between regulation and the facilitation of business practice remains a point of discussion, with supporters emphasizing consumer trust and detractors cautioning against overregulation that might stifle entrepreneurship.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around how the bill intricately defines different types of dealers and the potential implications of such delineations on businesses not explicitly labeled as secondhand dealers. Critics might raise concerns that the bill could inadvertently result in increased operational complexity for businesses that fall under these definitions and may argue for further clarification or exemptions. Additionally, discussions may be centered on the enforcement of such regulatory changes and their impact on various stakeholders within the community.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3198

Sales and use taxes.

CA AB2574

Sales and use taxes: exemption: research and development: design: digital interactive media.

LA SB164

Provides relative to the Video Draw Poker Devices Control Law. (8/1/13)

CT SB01219

An Act Concerning The Leasing Of Judicial Branch Facilities.

CA SB600

Sales and use taxes: exemption: manufacturing and research: useful life: electric power generation.

AZ SB1298

Property tax exemption; religious activities

TX HB2258

Relating to the use and transferability of certain state property transferred from the state to Spindletop MHMR Services.

CA AB1951

Sales and use tax: exemptions: manufacturing.