Connecticut Senate Bill SB01016

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/13
• Refer: 2/28/13
• Report Pass: 3/25/13
• Refer: 4/5/13
• Report Pass: 4/11/13
• Refer: 4/18/13
• Report Pass: 4/23/13
• Report Pass: 4/24/13
• Refer: 5/1/13
• Report Pass: 5/7/13
• Report Pass: 5/8/13
• Engrossed: 5/16/13
• Report Pass: 5/17/13
• Chaptered: 5/29/13
• Enrolled: 5/30/13
• Passed: 6/5/13

Caption

An Act Regulating The Planting And Sale Of Running Bamboo.

Impact

The introduction of this bill signifies a proactive approach by the state towards controlling environmental issues linked to invasive species like running bamboo. By enforcing regulations that require property owners to manage containment effectively, the bill seeks to mitigate the impact of running bamboo on neighboring properties, promoting better land management practices. It also mandates retail sellers to inform consumers about the potential spread of bamboo and the necessary precautions, contributing to an informed public regarding landscaping choices.

Summary

Senate Bill 1016, titled 'An Act Regulating The Planting And Sale Of Running Bamboo,' addresses the growth and distribution of running bamboo plants, which are classified as invasive species. The bill aims to limit the spread of running bamboo by imposing strict guidelines on where such plants can be planted and the responsibilities of property owners. Specifically, it prohibits planting running bamboo within one hundred feet of neighboring properties or public right-of-ways unless proper containment measures are in place. Violations beyond property boundaries can lead to liability for damages and fines.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding SB 1016 were primarily constructive, focusing on the environmental implications and the need for proper landscaping practices. Supporters of the bill argue that it is essential for preserving local ecosystems and preventing property disputes caused by bamboo encroachment. However, some members of the community expressed concerns about overregulation, fearing that such laws might hinder personal property rights and the ability to cultivate desired plant species.

Contention

Notable points of contention included the balance between individual property rights and environmental stewardship. Critics raised questions about the practicality of enforcement and whether homeowners should be responsible for the actions of plant species beyond their control. Moreover, the requirement for retailers to provide information about the invasive nature of running bamboo introduced concerns about the additional regulatory burden on small business owners in the gardening and landscaping industry. Overall, the bill reflects an effort to reconcile ecological interests with property rights.