Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01061

Introduced
3/6/13  
Refer
3/6/13  
Report Pass
3/13/13  
Refer
3/18/13  
Report Pass
3/25/13  
Report Pass
3/25/13  
Engrossed
4/18/13  
Engrossed
4/18/13  
Report Pass
4/19/13  
Report Pass
4/19/13  
Chaptered
5/13/13  
Chaptered
5/13/13  
Enrolled
5/14/13  
Enrolled
5/14/13  
Passed
5/17/13  

Caption

An Act Confirming And Adopting Volumes 1 To 13, Inclusive, Of The General Statutes, Revised To 2013.

Impact

The passage of SB01061 establishes a formal recognition of the revised General Statutes, effectively resetting and confirming the statutory laws in Connecticut as of 2013. By adopting these statutes, it eliminates any previous ambiguities or outdated provisions, thus streamlining legal references and resources. This act serves to enhance the legal framework, making it more user-friendly for legislators, lawyers, and state officials during the implementation and enforcement of laws.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 1061 is an Act confirming and adopting Volumes 1 to 13 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, which were revised to January 1, 2013. The bill encompasses a significant consolidation, codification, arrangement, and revision of public acts from 1959 through 2012, ensuring that the state's legal framework is up to date and accessible. This bill symbolizes the ongoing effort to maintain an organized and coherent body of law within Connecticut, which is essential for both legal practitioners and the public's understanding of state laws.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB01061 appears to be positive, with a consensus on the necessity of codifying and revising the statutes for clarity and accessibility. Legislators and legal experts recognize the importance of keeping the statutory framework current and effectively managed, leading to overall support for the bill. The unanimous vote indicated strong bipartisan agreement on the need for a thorough revision of the state's General Statutes.

Contention

While the bill enjoyed widespread support, some points of contention could arise from the debate over specific revisions included in the consolidation process, as stakeholders may have differing interpretations of how these changes affect particular statutes. However, the lack of dissenting votes suggests that any such contentions were resolved prior to the voting, reflecting broad agreement on its provisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.