Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01122

Introduced
3/12/13  
Refer
3/12/13  
Report Pass
4/12/13  
Refer
4/18/13  
Report Pass
4/24/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Extradition Of Fugitives.

Impact

The enactment of SB01122 would amend the existing statutes concerning bail bonds by establishing criteria under which bondsmen can be relieved of liability for bail forfeiture if the defendant is located out of state. It aims to streamline the process and encourage bondsmen to participate actively in managing the obligations that come with extradition requests. The anticipated outcome is that this would enhance cooperation and communication among law enforcement agencies across state lines regarding fugitive apprehension.

Summary

SB01122, titled 'An Act Concerning the Extradition of Fugitives', was introduced in the Connecticut General Assembly with implications for how extradition processes are managed in the state. The primary focus of the bill is to provide clarity on the procedures regarding the forfeiture of bail bonds when the principal is detained in another jurisdiction. It stipulates that a court must vacate an order forfeiting a bail bond if certain conditions are met relating to the detention of the principal and the actions of the state attorney regarding extradition proceedings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01122 appears generally supportive among law enforcement and bail bonding professionals, who believe that the bill offers necessary protections for bondsmen while promoting efficient extradition. However, skepticism exists regarding the execution of these provisions, with concerns raised about potential loopholes or unintended consequences that might arise as the law is implemented.

Contention

Key points of contention discussed revolve around the responsibilities placed on the state's attorney and the requirements for bondsmen to prove detainment. Critics may argue that the law could complicate matters for state attorneys or unfairly burden bondsmen with additional prerequisites. The effectiveness of the coordination between states during extradition procedures is also a topic of debate, as it may rely heavily on the promptness and willingness of various jurisdictions to cooperate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05500

An Act Concerning Revisions To Various Laws Concerning Ignition Interlock Devices, The Department Of Correction, Judicial Retirement Salaries And Criminal Law And Criminal Procedure.

CT SB00426

An Act Concerning Court Operations And Administrative Proceedings.

CT HB05467

An Act Concerning Firearms Background Checks.

CT HB05505

An Act Concerning Self-defense, Defense Of A Third Person And Assisting In Or Effecting An Arrest As Affirmative Defenses.

CT SB00428

An Act Concerning Business Registrations Filed With The Secretary Of The State.

CT SB00228

An Act Concerning Annual Random Audits Of Professional Bondsmen.

CT HB05422

An Act Concerning Hate And Bias Crimes.

CT SB00444

An Act Concerning The Modification Of Sentences For Cannabis-related Offenses.

CT SB00212

An Act Concerning The Revisor's Technical Corrections To The General Statutes.

CT HB05509

An Act Concerning The Enticement Of A Minor To Commit A Crime, Searches Of A Motor Vehicle, The Psychiatric Security Review Board And Victims' Compensation.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.