Connecticut Senate Bill SB01122

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/13
• Refer: 3/12/13
• Report Pass: 4/12/13
• Refer: 4/18/13
• Report Pass: 4/24/13

Caption

An Act Concerning The Extradition Of Fugitives.

Impact

The enactment of SB01122 would amend the existing statutes concerning bail bonds by establishing criteria under which bondsmen can be relieved of liability for bail forfeiture if the defendant is located out of state. It aims to streamline the process and encourage bondsmen to participate actively in managing the obligations that come with extradition requests. The anticipated outcome is that this would enhance cooperation and communication among law enforcement agencies across state lines regarding fugitive apprehension.

Summary

SB01122, titled 'An Act Concerning the Extradition of Fugitives', was introduced in the Connecticut General Assembly with implications for how extradition processes are managed in the state. The primary focus of the bill is to provide clarity on the procedures regarding the forfeiture of bail bonds when the principal is detained in another jurisdiction. It stipulates that a court must vacate an order forfeiting a bail bond if certain conditions are met relating to the detention of the principal and the actions of the state attorney regarding extradition proceedings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01122 appears generally supportive among law enforcement and bail bonding professionals, who believe that the bill offers necessary protections for bondsmen while promoting efficient extradition. However, skepticism exists regarding the execution of these provisions, with concerns raised about potential loopholes or unintended consequences that might arise as the law is implemented.

Contention

Key points of contention discussed revolve around the responsibilities placed on the state's attorney and the requirements for bondsmen to prove detainment. Critics may argue that the law could complicate matters for state attorneys or unfairly burden bondsmen with additional prerequisites. The effectiveness of the coordination between states during extradition procedures is also a topic of debate, as it may rely heavily on the promptness and willingness of various jurisdictions to cooperate.