Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | - | General Assembly Substitute Bill No. 1133 | |
2 | - | January Session, 2013 *_____SB01133CE_LAB032613____* | |
1 | + | General Assembly Raised Bill No. 1133 | |
2 | + | January Session, 2013 LCO No. 4402 | |
3 | + | *04402_______CE_* | |
4 | + | Referred to Committee on COMMERCE | |
5 | + | Introduced by: | |
6 | + | (CE) | |
3 | 7 | ||
4 | 8 | General Assembly | |
5 | 9 | ||
6 | - | ||
10 | + | Raised Bill No. 1133 | |
7 | 11 | ||
8 | 12 | January Session, 2013 | |
9 | 13 | ||
10 | - | ||
14 | + | LCO No. 4402 | |
11 | 15 | ||
12 | - | AN ACT CONCERNING BIDDING PREFERENCES IN STATE AND MUNICIPAL CONTRACTING. | |
16 | + | *04402_______CE_* | |
17 | + | ||
18 | + | Referred to Committee on COMMERCE | |
19 | + | ||
20 | + | Introduced by: | |
21 | + | ||
22 | + | (CE) | |
23 | + | ||
24 | + | AN ACT CONCERNING PREFERENCES FOR CONNECTICUT COMPANIES IN STATE AND MUNICIPAL CONTRACTING. | |
13 | 25 | ||
14 | 26 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: | |
15 | 27 | ||
16 | - | Section 1. ( | |
28 | + | Section 1. Subsection (b) of section 4e-48 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2013): | |
17 | 29 | ||
18 | - | (b) If a state contractor whose bid was adjusted pursuant to subsection (a) of this section is awarded the state contract and in executing such contract pays its employees less in the aggregate than the amount projected in such adjusted bid, the state contracting agency shall pay such contractor an amount less than the amount of the bid prior to its adjustment in accordance with subsection (a) of this section, and such amount shall be equal to the difference between (1) the amount of Connecticut income taxes projected to be paid by its employees in accordance with subsection (a) of this section, and (2) the estimated Connecticut income tax paid by its employees, when assuming an income tax rate of five per cent. | |
19 | - | ||
20 | - | (c) Each state contracting agency that has awarded a contract to a contractor whose bid was adjusted pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall confirm the number of employees actually employed in the state on such project by such contractor, annually in the case of a contract with a duration of more than a year and, if such contract has a duration of less than a year, prior to the final payment for such contract. If the state contracting agency determines that the payment of the contractor needs to be adjusted in accordance with subsection (b) of this section, the state contracting agency shall make such adjustment not later than a year after the awarding of such contract in the case of a contract with a duration of more than a year and, if such contract has a duration of less than a year, at the time of final payment for such contract. | |
30 | + | (b) Notwithstanding any provision of [law] the general statutes, in the award of a contract, after the original bids have been received and an original lowest responsible qualified bid is identified, a state contracting agency shall add [a per cent increase to the original bid of a nonresident bidder] to the original bid of a nonresident bidder the greater of (1) a one-half of one per cent increase, or (2) an increase equal to the per cent, if any, of the preference given to such nonresident bidder in the state in which such nonresident bidder resides. If, after application of such per cent increase, the bidder that submits the lowest responsible qualified bid is a resident bidder, the state contracting agency shall award such contract to such resident bidder provided such resident bidder agrees, in writing, to meet the original lowest responsible qualified bid. Any such agreement by such resident bidder to meet the original lowest responsible qualified bid shall be made not later than seventy-two hours after such resident bidder receives notice from such state contracting agency that such resident bidder may be awarded such contract if such resident bidder agrees to meet the original lowest responsible qualified bid. | |
21 | 31 | ||
22 | 32 | Sec. 2. Section 7-148v of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2013): | |
23 | 33 | ||
24 | 34 | Notwithstanding the provisions of any municipal charter or any special act to the contrary, any municipality may, by ordinance, establish requirements for competitive bidding for the award of any contract or the purchase of any real or personal property by the municipality. Such ordinance may provide that [,] (1) except as otherwise required by any provision of the general statutes, sealed bidding shall not be required for contracts or purchases having a value less than or equal to an amount established in the ordinance, which amount shall not be greater than seven thousand five hundred dollars, and (2) all other factors being equal, preference shall be given to supplies, materials and equipment produced, assembled or manufactured in the state and services originating and provided in the state. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to invalidate any ordinance enacted by a municipality prior to October 1, 1989. Nothing in this section and no ordinance adopted pursuant to this section shall be construed to limit the ability of a municipality to enter into a contract pursuant to section 4a-53a. | |
25 | 35 | ||
26 | - | Sec. 3. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2013) The Commissioner of Administrative Services, in consultation with the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection, shall develop a method by which to measure the environmental impact and cost of awarding a state construction contract to a bidder. Such method shall include, but not be limited to, a consideration of (1) the distance of such bidder from the project site, (2) fuel consumption resulting from the transportation of goods to the project site by such bidder, and (3) the potential pollution created by the transportation of such goods to the project site by such bidder. Not later than January 1, 2015, the Commissioner of Administrative Services shall incorporate such method in the awarding of state contracts. | |
27 | - | ||
28 | 36 | ||
29 | 37 | ||
30 | 38 | ||
31 | 39 | This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections: | |
32 | - | Section 1 October 1, 2013 | |
40 | + | Section 1 October 1, 2013 4e-48(b) | |
33 | 41 | Sec. 2 October 1, 2013 7-148v | |
34 | - | Sec. 3 October 1, 2013 New section | |
35 | 42 | ||
36 | 43 | This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections: | |
37 | 44 | ||
38 | 45 | Section 1 | |
39 | 46 | ||
40 | 47 | October 1, 2013 | |
41 | 48 | ||
42 | - | ||
49 | + | 4e-48(b) | |
43 | 50 | ||
44 | 51 | Sec. 2 | |
45 | 52 | ||
46 | 53 | October 1, 2013 | |
47 | 54 | ||
48 | 55 | 7-148v | |
49 | 56 | ||
50 | - | ||
57 | + | Statement of Purpose: | |
51 | 58 | ||
52 | - | ||
59 | + | To expand the preference for in-state bidders in the award of state contracts and allow municipalities to enact similar preferences. | |
53 | 60 | ||
54 | - | New section | |
55 | - | ||
56 | - | ||
57 | - | ||
58 | - | CE Joint Favorable Subst. C/R LAB | |
59 | - | ||
60 | - | CE | |
61 | - | ||
62 | - | Joint Favorable Subst. C/R | |
63 | - | ||
64 | - | LAB | |
61 | + | [Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets. Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] |