Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01154

Introduced
3/27/13  
Refer
3/27/13  
Refer
3/27/13  
Report Pass
4/12/13  
Report Pass
4/12/13  
Refer
4/18/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Accidental Failure Of Suit Statute.

Impact

This legislation significantly alters Section 52-592 of the General Statutes by allowing a new action to be commenced within one year after a dismissal or a judgment reversal, provided the original suit met specific conditions that would have prevented it from being decided on its merits. As a result, this bill seeks to streamline the process for those who face procedural dismissals that can occur for complex reasons. The revisions aim to enhance access to the courts for individuals who might otherwise be barred from seeking legal recourse due to procedural failures.

Summary

SB01154, also known as the Act Concerning the Accidental Failure of Suit Statute, aims to address the situations where legal actions are hindered from being tried on their merits due to various procedural issues such as insufficient service or dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. The bill allows plaintiffs to refile their actions within a set timeframe following certain failures of their initial suits, effectively expanding the circumstances under which plaintiffs can seek justice even after adverse procedural outcomes. This amendment is designed to reduce the impact of technicalities on a plaintiff's right to pursue their case.

Sentiment

The general sentiment among legislators appears to support the bill from a perspective of fairness and access to justice. Advocates argue that it addresses a critical gap in the legal system where individuals could find themselves unfairly disadvantaged due to technical procedural issues. However, there may be concerns regarding the potential for increased litigation as a result of more permissive re-filing capabilities. Overall, the discussions suggest a balanced view of promoting justice while being wary of any unintended consequences.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB01154 include the potential for increased court dockets as plaintiffs may chose to refile suits that had previously been dismissed. Critics may argue that this could lead to overburdening the court system and could inadvertently create avenues for abuse, where plaintiffs could indiscriminately refile suits without substantive cause. The ongoing debate focuses on how to maintain an efficient legal process while ensuring that individuals have adequate pathways to address grievances arising from procedural mishaps.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05487

An Act Concerning The Operation And Administration Of The Office Of The Claims Commissioner.

CT SB00426

An Act Concerning Court Operations And Administrative Proceedings.

CT HB05144

An Act Concerning The Assignment Of Certain Liens.

CT HB05331

An Act Concerning The Suspension Of Motor Vehicle Operators' Licenses For Failure To Pay Fines Or Fees Or Failure To Appear For A Scheduled Court Appearance.

CT HB05310

An Act Concerning Presidential Electors And The Certification Or Declaration Of Election Results.

CT HB05242

An Act Concerning The Collateral Consequences Of Criminal Records On Housing Opportunities.

CT SB00212

An Act Concerning The Revisor's Technical Corrections To The General Statutes.

CT HB05145

An Act Concerning Innovation Banks.

CT SB00251

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Technical And Other Revisions To The Tax And Related Statutes.

CT SB00220

An Act Concerning Clarifying The Appeals Process Under The Paid Family And Medical Leave Statutes.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.