Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01166

Introduced
4/10/13  
Refer
4/10/13  
Report Pass
4/19/13  
Refer
4/29/13  
Report Pass
5/6/13  
Refer
5/15/13  
Report Pass
5/21/13  
Report Pass
5/21/13  
Report Pass
5/21/13  
Refer
5/28/13  
Report Pass
5/30/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Ignition Interlock Devices.

Impact

The enactment of SB 1166 significantly alters the existing framework around the management of DUI offenses. It not only increases penalties for repeat offenders, including heightened fines and longer imprisonment terms, but also emphasizes the installation of ignition interlock devices as a pre-condition for restoring driving privileges. This change aims to deter repeat offenses by ensuring that individuals must demonstrate responsible behavior through the use of IIDs, thus potentially reducing the rate of DUI incidents statewide.

Summary

Senate Bill 1166, titled An Act Concerning Ignition Interlock Devices, introduces stringent penalties for individuals convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) offenses in the state. It mandates that offenders must install ignition interlock devices (IIDs) on their vehicles, depending on the number of offenses committed. The law delineates specific fines, potential imprisonment terms, and conditions for probation, emphasizing rehabilitation through enforced measures such as community service and assessments through the state’s Court Support Services Division.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 1166 appears to be supportive among lawmakers interested in reducing DUI cases and enhancing public safety. However, there may be contention regarding the implications of mandatory IIDs on individuals' rights and their ability to maintain employment, especially among those whose offenses were non-violent. While proponents argue that IIDs are a responsible way to prevent drunk driving, critics may see this as an excessive punishment that may not address the root causes of alcohol abuse.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the efficacy and equity of installing IIDs, especially for first-time offenders. Critics argue that individuals may face burdensome financial challenges in securing the device and maintaining it, and this additional requirement could disproportionately affect lower-income offenders. The bill's supporters maintain that the measures are crucial for public safety and will ultimately lead to a broader societal benefit by aiming to rehabilitate offenders rather than merely punishing them.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2210

Driving under the influence: ignition interlock devices.

AZ HB2153

Interlock restricted licenses; violations; reporting

CA SB1021

Vehicles: driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

AZ HB2886

Ignition interlock devices; violation; classification

CA SB421

Vehicles: driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs.

IA SF2261

A bill for an act relating to operating-while-intoxicated offenses, including temporary restricted licenses and ignition interlock devices, providing penalties, making penalties applicable, and including effective date and applicability provisions. (Formerly SSB 3015.) Effective date: 01/01/2025. Applicability date: 01/01/2025.

CA SB783

Vehicles: driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs.

AR HB1875

To Amend The Law Concerning The Use Of An Ignition Interlock Device; And To Provide For The Extension Of The Mandatory Period For The Use Of An Ignition Interlock Device.