Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05222

Introduced
2/19/14  
Refer
2/19/14  
Refer
2/19/14  
Report Pass
3/11/14  
Refer
3/18/14  
Report Pass
3/25/14  
Report Pass
3/25/14  
Engrossed
4/24/14  
Engrossed
4/24/14  
Report Pass
4/28/14  
Chaptered
5/9/14  
Enrolled
5/14/14  
Enrolled
5/14/14  
Passed
5/28/14  

Caption

An Act Concerning A Study Of Funding And Support For Home And Community-based Care For Elderly Persons And Persons With Alzheimer's Disease.

Impact

The introduction of HB 5222 is intended to help enhance the quality of care available to vulnerable populations, particularly the growing number of elderly individuals and those with Alzheimer's. By analyzing the existing funding frameworks and care programs, the bill could lead to the allocation of additional resources to vital areas of need in home and community care. This, in turn, may affect state laws regarding budget allocations and the provision of health and social services for the aging population.

Summary

House Bill 5222 aims to address the needs of elderly persons and those suffering from Alzheimer's disease by mandating a study of funding and support for home and community-based care services. The bill specifically tasks the Commission on Aging with investigating the availability of private funding sources, the state-funded programs currently in operation, and the cost-effectiveness of these initiatives. The findings are to be reported back to the General Assembly by January 1, 2015, including recommendations for program enhancements to better support the targeted demographic.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 5222 appears largely supportive, given the pressing need for effective care solutions for the elderly and individuals with Alzheimer's disease. Stakeholders in the aging community have welcomed the proactive approach taken by the legislation, viewing it as an opportunity to improve access to necessary care services. However, there may be concerns about the actual implementation of the recommendations made by the Commission on Aging and how promptly the state may act on expanding programs.

Contention

While the bill generally enjoys support, there could be contention regarding the specific recommendations that arise from the study. Stakeholders may debate the prioritization of certain programs over others or the adequacy of funding for those programs deemed essential. Some critics may also call attention to the potential bureaucratic challenges or delays in executing the recommendations stemming from the report, which could ultimately impact the timeliness of care for those in need.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.