Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05253

Introduced
2/19/14  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association And The Connecticut Life And Health Insurance Guaranty Association.

Impact

The implications of HB05253 are noteworthy for both insurers and their clients. By clarifying the obligations of the insurance guaranty associations and establishing a more structured approach to handling claims after an insurer's insolvency, the bill aims to enhance consumer protection. This change could lead to faster resolutions for policyholders who may otherwise face financial uncertainty following an insurer's failure. It is also poised to impact the operational practices of insurers, as they may need to prepare for increased financial accountability and potential assessments based on their covered claims.

Summary

House Bill 05253, titled 'An Act Concerning The Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association And The Connecticut Life And Health Insurance Guaranty Association,' aims to amend existing laws governing the operations of these associations in the context of insurance company insolvencies. This legislation proposes significant changes regarding the timeline for coverage of claims from insured parties following the insolvency declaration of an insurer. Specifically, it extends the duration from thirty to sixty days during which claims arising from polices are considered covered. Additionally, it raises the maximum coverage amount for claims related to worker's compensation policies, thereby potentially increasing the financial security of those relying on these policies.

Contention

Despite the potential benefits, there are points of contention surrounding the bill. Some stakeholders argue that the increased maximum coverage amounts could create undue financial pressures on the guaranty associations, particularly if there are multiple insurer insolvencies within a short timeframe. Additionally, there are concerns about the administrative burden placed on the associations in managing these changes, as well as the potential effects on premium rates for policyholders. Opponents may argue that the bill could lead to higher overall costs within the insurance market, which could ultimately be passed down to consumers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A2233

Requires public utilities and cable television companies to accommodate and relocate facilities and pay costs thereof when necessary for infrastructure projects.

NJ A1458

Requires public utilities and cable television companies to accommodate and relocate facilities and pay costs thereof when necessary for infrastructure projects.

CA AB1051

Medi-Cal: specialty mental health services: foster children.

NJ S3811

Revises definition of "contracting unit" for government cooperative purchasing agreements.

NJ A5019

Revises definition of "contracting unit" for government cooperative purchasing agreements.

CA AB826

Emergency food assistance: COVID-19.

NJ S1442

Modifies use of cooperative purchasing agreements by certain public contracting units for construction services; prohibits time-and-materials contracts in certain circumstances; allows indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity public contracts in certain circumstances.

NJ A4025

Modifies use of cooperative purchasing agreements by certain public contracting units for construction services; prohibits time-and-materials contracts in certain circumstances; allows indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity public contracts in certain circumstances.