Connecticut House Bill HB05270

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/14
• Refer: 2/20/14
• Report Pass: 3/11/14
• Refer: 3/20/14
• Report Pass: 3/26/14

Caption

An Act Concerning The Delegation Authority Of The Commissioner Of Economic And Community Development.

Impact

If enacted, HB 05270 would amend existing statutes to expand the capabilities of the Commissioner to administer various programs and provide technical assistance for business expansion and development. This includes the ability to assist local municipalities in securing federal and state financial support for economic development programs. The increased delegation of authority to the Commissioner is designed to make the state more responsive to the needs of businesses and communities, potentially leading to enhanced economic opportunities across Connecticut.

Summary

House Bill 05270, titled 'An Act Concerning The Delegation Authority Of The Commissioner Of Economic And Community Development,' focuses on enhancing the powers and responsibilities of the Commissioner of Economic and Community Development in Connecticut. This bill is intended to bolster economic growth and community development by providing the commissioner with greater authority to support businesses, both new and existing, through coordinated efforts at the state and local levels. The bill encourages collaboration between state agencies and local governments, aiming to streamline processes that benefit economic initiatives.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05270 seemed generally positive among business advocates and officials who support increased governmental involvement in economic development. Proponents argue that by consolidating authority and resources under the commissioner, the state can effectively attract and retain businesses, create jobs, and improve community welfare. However, there may be concerns from some community advocates about the balance of power and the degree to which local voices are represented in economic decision-making.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the measure's implications for local governance. Critics might argue that while increased state support for economic development is beneficial, it could lead to diminished local control over economic and community initiatives. This tension between state involvement and local autonomy is a recurring theme in discussions about economic policy in Connecticut, raising important questions about how best to serve the diverse needs of its communities.