Connecticut House Bill HB05290

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/14
• Refer: 2/20/14
• Report Pass: 3/14/14
• Refer: 3/28/14
• Report Pass: 4/3/14
• Refer: 4/8/14
• Report Pass: 4/15/14
• Refer: 4/17/14
• Engrossed: 4/30/14
• Report Pass: 5/1/14
• Chaptered: 5/20/14
• Enrolled: 5/21/14
• Passed: 6/6/14

Caption

An Act Revising Motor Vehicle Laws.

Impact

If enacted, HB 05290 would modify existing procedures surrounding the proof of insurance and vehicle registration. The bill eliminates the requirement for certain vehicles, including those owned by the federal government and manufacturers, to acquire a certificate of title unless they are registered in the state. This change is expected to reduce bureaucratic hurdles for specific vehicle owners and streamline the registration process, potentially encouraging more compliance with safety regulations.

Summary

House Bill 05290 aims to revise and update various laws pertaining to motor vehicles in the state. One major component of the bill is the establishment of an electronic system by the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles to verify insurance coverage for motor vehicles, thereby mandating that vehicle owners ensure their compliance with state security requirements. This electronic verification system aims to enhance the efficiency of the registration process and ensure that all motor vehicle owners have the necessary liability coverage required by law.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 05290 has been generally positive among proponents who highlight its potential to improve compliance with vehicle insurance laws and enhance public safety on the roads. Supporters argue that the electronic verification system would make it easier for the state to ensure that vehicles on the road are properly insured, reducing the risk of accidents and liabilities for uninsured drivers.

Contention

However, some members of the legislature expressed concerns about the implications of these revisions, particularly regarding data privacy and the potential overreach of governmental authority in monitoring compliance. Critics argue that while improving verification processes is essential, it should not come at the cost of infringing on individual rights or privacy. This contention highlights a significant aspect of the ongoing debate about the balance between regulatory oversight and personal liberty in matters concerning vehicle ownership and operation.