Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05378

Introduced
2/26/14  
Refer
2/26/14  
Report Pass
3/13/14  
Refer
3/24/14  
Report Pass
3/31/14  
Report Pass
3/31/14  
Refer
4/8/14  
Refer
4/8/14  
Report Pass
4/15/14  
Report Pass
4/15/14  
Refer
4/17/14  
Refer
4/17/14  
Engrossed
5/1/14  
Engrossed
5/1/14  
Report Pass
5/2/14  
Report Pass
5/2/14  
Chaptered
5/9/14  
Enrolled
5/14/14  
Passed
5/28/14  

Caption

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Legislative Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning Medicaid-funded Emergency Department Visits.

Impact

The legislation anticipates significant changes in how Medicaid emergency services are managed. By requiring the establishment of regional intensive case management teams, the bill aims to provide more comprehensive support for clients, guiding them towards primary care providers, thus potentially alleviating congestion in emergency departments. This could lead to reduced healthcare costs over time while improving patient outcomes for those who frequently utilize emergency services. Furthermore, the bill mandates the analysis and reporting of emergency department usage statistics, enhancing oversight.

Summary

House Bill 5378, concerning Medicaid-funded emergency department visits, initiates reforms aimed at improving care coordination for frequent users of emergency services. It outlines the responsibilities of contracted administrative services organizations to manage and reduce unnecessary emergency department visits among Medicaid clients through intensive case management and coordinated care efforts. The bill stipulates that administrative organizations must identify hospitals that cater to frequent Medicaid users and develop tailored care plans to reduce their emergency department reliance.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 5378 appears largely supportive among healthcare professionals and legislators focused on efficiency in Medicaid spending. Many see the proposed measures as necessary steps toward improving access to care for vulnerable populations and creating a more sustainable model for emergency services. However, there remains concern regarding the execution of these mandates and whether adequate resources will be provided to effectively manage the workflow changes, particularly within emergency departments.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include concerns about the administrative burden it places on hospitals and healthcare providers. Critics argue that without sufficient funding and support, these organizations may struggle to meet the bill's requirements. There is also apprehension regarding the accuracy of the data to be collected on Medicaid clients and whether the proposed case management strategies will sufficiently address the root causes of frequent emergency department use, rather than just the symptoms.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB06946

An Act Concerning Husky Programs.

CT SB00927

An Act Concerning Seclusion And Restraint In Schools.

TX SB7

Relating to improving the delivery and quality of certain health and human services, including the delivery and quality of Medicaid acute care services and long-term services and supports.

NJ A1860

Increases Medicaid reimbursement rates for primary care services; appropriates $20 million.

KY HB785

AN ACT relating to the Medicaid program.

KY SB153

AN ACT relating to prepayment review of Medicaid claims.

TX HB4611

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of the health and human services laws governing the Health and Human Services Commission, Medicaid, and other social services.

TX SB200

Relating to the continuation and functions of the Health and Human Services Commission and the provision of health and human services in this state.