Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05417

Introduced
2/27/14  
Introduced
2/27/14  
Refer
2/27/14  
Refer
2/27/14  
Report Pass
3/17/14  
Report Pass
3/17/14  
Refer
3/27/14  
Refer
3/27/14  
Report Pass
4/2/14  
Report Pass
4/2/14  
Engrossed
5/7/14  
Engrossed
5/7/14  
Report Pass
5/7/14  
Report Pass
5/7/14  
Chaptered
5/21/14  
Chaptered
5/21/14  
Enrolled
5/28/14  
Enrolled
5/28/14  
Vetoed
5/30/14  

Caption

An Act Establishing A Season For The Taking Of Glass Eels.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts state laws relating to marine resource management. By legalizing the taking of glass eels through a regulated framework, it aims to support the fishing industry while ensuring sustainable practices are followed. This introduces compliance protocols that will be essential for both fishers and regulatory agencies. The limited access permit system proposed allows for a controlled approach to eel harvesting, potentially benefiting local economies that rely on this marine resource. It is anticipated that the implementation of this regulation will help balance ecological preservation with economic opportunities.

Summary

House Bill 5417, also known as An Act Establishing A Season For The Taking Of Glass Eels, intends to regulate the harvesting of glass eels and elver eels in Connecticut’s waters. The legislation specifically replaces previous prohibitions against taking these eels with a structured approach that allows for limited harvesting under certain conditions. Starting January 1, 2015, the bill empowers the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection to implement harvest restrictions and a limited access permit system, contingent upon authorization from the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission.

Sentiment

General sentiment around the bill appears positive, particularly among stakeholders in the fishing industry who see this as an opportunity to legally engage in a controlled harvest of glass eels. Supporters argue that this bill will promote responsible fishing practices and sustainable use of marine resources. However, some environmental advocates may express concerns about the potential overharvesting and the long-term ecological impacts. Therefore, the bill has sparked discussions about the need for rigorous regulatory frameworks to ensure that environmental standards are met.

Contention

While the bill is aimed at enhancing fishing opportunities, contention arises regarding its implementation and enforcement. Critics may argue that establishing a limited access permit system could be challenging, particularly in managing who qualifies for permits and ensuring compliance. There may also be concerns regarding the adequacy of oversight from the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection to prevent illegal harvesting activities. Overall, discussions highlight a delicate balance between economic benefit and ecological responsibility, necessitating ongoing stakeholder engagement and regulatory vigilance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.