Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05476

Introduced
3/4/14  
Refer
3/4/14  
Report Pass
3/18/14  
Report Pass
3/18/14  
Refer
3/26/14  
Report Pass
4/1/14  
Report Pass
4/1/14  
Engrossed
5/6/14  
Engrossed
5/6/14  
Report Pass
5/6/14  
Report Pass
5/6/14  
Chaptered
5/21/14  
Chaptered
5/21/14  
Enrolled
5/28/14  
Enrolled
5/28/14  

Caption

An Act Concerning A Study Of The Feasibility Of Legalizing Industrial Hemp.

Impact

The passage of this bill could significantly alter the regulatory landscape surrounding industrial hemp. By advocating for the legalization of industrial hemp, the bill suggests an amendment to current laws that classify it under the definition of controlled substances. This change would not only provide clarity in the regulatory framework but also open new avenues for agricultural practices and business development within the state, potentially leading to the establishment of a licensing system for growers and sellers of industrial hemp.

Summary

House Bill 5476 is a legislative measure focusing on the feasibility of legalizing industrial hemp in the state. The bill stipulates that a study will be conducted by the Commissioners of Agriculture, Consumer Protection, and Economic and Community Development, in consultation with the Attorney General. This study aims to explore various aspects of industrial hemp, including its production, possession, and sale, all with the purpose of bolstering economic development and increasing business opportunities in the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 5476 appears to be largely positive, particularly among agricultural and business proponents who view the legalization of industrial hemp as a means to stimulate economic growth. Supporters argue that legalizing industrial hemp introduces a new crop that can benefit farmers and the economy at large while offering a sustainable alternative for various industries. However, there may also be caution from some regulatory and consumer protection advocates who are concerned about potential misuse or inadequate frameworks for managing the newly legalized commodity, particularly in differentiating between industrial hemp and marijuana.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 5476 include the challenges of defining industrial hemp as distinct from marijuana, especially regarding THC content. The bill suggests that establishing a clear legal definition is crucial for preventing confusion and ensuring compliance. Furthermore, the establishment of a regulatory framework, including licensing requirements for industrial hemp growers and sellers, may be met with scrutiny regarding its implementation and the potential for overregulation that could stifle business opportunities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.