Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05514

Introduced
3/6/14  
Refer
3/6/14  
Report Pass
3/18/14  
Refer
3/31/14  
Refer
3/31/14  
Report Pass
4/7/14  
Report Pass
4/7/14  
Refer
4/15/14  
Refer
4/15/14  
Report Pass
4/17/14  
Engrossed
5/1/14  
Engrossed
5/1/14  
Report Pass
5/2/14  
Report Pass
5/2/14  
Chaptered
5/14/14  
Enrolled
5/19/14  
Enrolled
5/19/14  
Passed
6/3/14  

Caption

An Act Concerning An Optional Method Of Foreclosure.

Impact

The bill modifies existing foreclosure processes by allowing for an alternative where foreclosures can be executed via market sale, which may lead to quicker resolutions of mortgage debts. The implications for state laws include revisions to how foreclosures are conducted, requiring detailed notices to mortgagors and setting standards for appraisals and listing agreements. These changes aim to provide clarity in the foreclosure process and may impact the dynamics of real estate transactions within the state.

Summary

House Bill 05514 introduces an optional method of foreclosure, allowing mortgagees to pursue a foreclosure by market sale under specific conditions. Effective October 1, 2014, the bill permits the mortgagee, with the consent of the mortgagor, to foreclose a mortgage through a market sale rather than traditional foreclosure processes. This method aims to provide a streamlined approach, potentially benefiting both mortgagors and mortgagees by offering a more flexible avenue for resolving mortgage defaults.,

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05514 appears to be generally positive, particularly among those advocating for more efficient pathways out of foreclosure situations. Proponents argue that this bill offers a necessary update to outdated foreclosure laws, enhancing protections for homeowners while facilitating a smoother process for all parties involved. There may be concerned voices leaning against the changes, primarily worried about the long-term implications for homeowners facing foreclosure.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions about this bill revolve around how the optional foreclosure by market sale process may affect existing legal protections for borrowers. Critics might argue that the opportunity for a market sale could unintentionally lead to increased pressures on vulnerable mortgagors to sell under less favorable conditions. Additionally, the requirement for mutual consent between the mortgagee and mortgagor in initiating a market sale means that both parties must reach an agreement, which could introduce complications if negotiations fail.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05567

An Act Concerning Alternatives To Foreclosures, The Foreclosure Mediation Program, And The Mortgagor In Good Standing Statutes.

CT HB06996

An Act Extending The Ezequiel Santiago Foreclosure Mediation Program Until June 30, 2023.

CT HB06752

An Act Extending The Foreclosure Mediation Program.

CT HB05495

An Act Removing The Sunset Date For The Foreclosure Mediation Program.

CT SB00162

An Act Extending The Foreclosure Mediation Program.

CT SB00891

An Act Concerning The Ezequiel Santiago Foreclosure Mediation Program And Other Alternatives To Foreclosure.

CT HB06355

An Act Concerning Homeowner Protection Rights.

CT SB00823

An Act Extending The Foreclosure Mediation Program Until June 30, 2023.