Connecticut Senate Bill SB00493

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/26/14
• Refer: 3/26/14
• Report Pass: 4/2/14
• Refer: 4/11/14
• Report Pass: 4/17/14
• Engrossed: 4/23/14
• Report Pass: 4/25/14
• Chaptered: 5/19/14
• Enrolled: 5/23/14
• Passed: 6/6/14

Caption

An Act Concerning The Revisor's Technical Corrections To The General Statutes.

Impact

The impact of SB00493 on state laws predominantly revolves around improving the accuracy and clarity of legislation. By enacting technical corrections, it is expected to streamline interpretations of various statutes for those who encounter them in legal or administrative contexts. Furthermore, the bill is designed to ensure that laws remain up-to-date, avoiding potential legal disputes stemming from outdated or unclear regulations. Such modifications are crucial for maintaining an effective legislative framework as they adapt to the prevailing social and judicial climate.

Summary

SB00493, titled 'An Act Concerning The Revisor's Technical Corrections To The General Statutes', aims to amend and clarify various provisions within the Connecticut General Statutes to enhance legal clarity and ensure consistent application of state laws. The bill addresses several technical issues discovered in former statutes, likely including typographical errors and obsolete references. The intent is to streamline legal language and remove ambiguity that may arise over time as laws evolve and changes occur across related provisions. The anticipated outcome is a more coherent and accessible legal framework within which citizens and legal practitioners can operate more effectively.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB00493 appears positive, reflecting a consensus among legislators regarding the importance of maintaining precise and functional legal statutes. Stakeholders, including lawmakers and legal professionals, appreciate the revisions that simplify and clarify laws, potentially reducing the administrative burden on the court system and government agencies. Nonetheless, while there is agreement on the need for these corrections, there may also be nuanced discussions about the effectiveness and scope of changes proposed within specific sections of the law.

Contention

While SB00493 seeks to resolve technical issues, potential points of contention may emerge regarding specific amendments that impact the interpretation of the current statutes. Some stakeholders might argue about the implications of these corrections, particularly if they perceive that certain changes could alter the intent or application of the law significantly. The legislative history indicates that the bill was passed unanimously in the House, reflecting cooperative bipartisan support, yet discussions may arise as the corrections are implemented and interpreted by courts and legal practitioners.