Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05296

Introduced
1/13/15  
Introduced
1/13/15  
Refer
1/13/15  
Refer
1/13/15  
Refer
3/11/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Businesses That Make Certain Unsolicited And Intentionally Misleading Telephone Calls To Consumers.

Impact

If enacted, HB 05296 would amend existing state laws related to unfair trade practices, defining certain deceptive telemarketing behaviors as unfair acts under the trade laws. This change would provide a legal framework for consumers to report and seek redress against businesses that engage in misleading calling methods. Additionally, it encourages citizens to take an active role in regulatory enforcement, potentially leading to increased accountability among businesses regarding their marketing practices.

Summary

House Bill 05296 aims to address the issue of unsolicited and intentionally misleading telephone calls made to consumers by businesses. The bill seeks to prohibit any person from making such calls that utilize misleading caller identification information with the intent to defraud or harm the recipient. It establishes guidelines for enforcement, encouraging individuals who become aware of these practices to report violations to the Attorney General, thereby strengthening consumer protections against deceptive telemarketing tactics.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely supportive among consumer rights advocates and those concerned about telemarketing practices. Proponents believe the bill is a necessary step toward protecting consumer interests and reducing the prevalence of deceptive calls. However, there may be concerns from businesses about increased regulatory scrutiny and potential costs associated with compliance, though these voices were less prominent in discussions.

Contention

Notably, there may be contention surrounding the enforcement mechanisms proposed within the bill. While the incentivization of reporting violations to the Attorney General aims to enhance consumer engagement, it raises questions about the balance of consumer empowerment against possible frivolous complaints. There could also be debates on defining what constitutes misleading practices, which may lead to disputes over interpretation and implementation in practical scenarios.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00121

An Act Concerning The Attorney General, The Banking Commissioner, The Dodd-frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act And Telephonic Sales Calls For Soliciting Consumer Goods Or Services.

CT SB00003

An Act Concerning Consumer Protection.

CT SB00297

An Act Concerning Consumer Protection For Customers Of Solar Power Companies.

CT SB00004

An Act Concerning Victims Of Domestic Violence, The Unsolicited Transmission Of Intimate Images By Means Of An Electronic Communication Device And The Impermissible Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements In The Workplace.

CT HB05004

An Act Concerning The Implementation Of Certain Climate Change Measures.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

CT HB05140

An Act Concerning Earned Wage Access.

CT HB05236

An Act Concerning Recommendations By The Department Of Consumer Protection.

CT HB05235

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Cannabis Regulation.

CT HB05177

An Act Concerning The Sale And Use Of Certain Nonaerial And Nonexplosive Consumer Fireworks.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.