Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05347

Introduced
1/14/15  
Introduced
1/14/15  
Refer
1/14/15  
Refer
3/10/15  
Report Pass
3/12/15  
Report Pass
3/23/15  
Report Pass
3/23/15  
Refer
3/27/15  
Refer
3/27/15  
Report Pass
4/2/15  

Caption

An Act Prohibiting The Use Of Natural Rubber Latex Gloves At Retail Food Establishments.

Impact

If passed, HB 05347 would amend existing health and safety regulations within the food service industry, explicitly banning the use of natural rubber latex gloves. Retail food establishments would need to adapt by transitioning to compliant glove materials, such as vinyl or nitrile gloves, which are deemed less risky for those with latex sensitivities. This change is expected to enhance the overall safety and inclusivity of food environments for both employees and patrons, potentially reducing medical incidents related to latex allergies.

Summary

House Bill 05347 aims to prohibit the use of natural rubber latex gloves in retail food establishments, including restaurants and food vending operations. This initiative is primarily based on concerns regarding public health and safety, particularly related to latex allergies that can affect both employees and customers. By legislating against the use of these types of gloves, the bill seeks to encourage the adoption of alternative materials that are safer for food handling and do not pose allergic reactions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards HB 05347 appears to be supportive among health advocates and food safety proponents who argue that eliminating latex gloves is a proactive measure to protect the well-being of the public. However, there might be opposition from business owners due to the potential costs associated with switching to alternative glove materials. The debate highlights the ongoing tension between ensuring public safety and addressing the economic concerns of small businesses in the food industry.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 05347 include concerns over the availability and cost of alternative gloves that meet food safety standards. Critics may argue that the mandate could disproportionately impact smaller food establishments that might find it difficult to absorb the additional costs associated with sourcing compliant gloves. The bill's discussion points to the broader implications of health legislation on local businesses, urging a careful balance between public health initiatives and economic considerations in the retail food sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.