Connecticut House Bill HB05660

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/15
• Refer: 1/21/15
• Refer: 3/18/15
• Report Pass: 3/19/15
• Refer: 3/27/15
• Report Pass: 4/2/15
• Engrossed: 5/27/15
• Report Pass: 5/30/15
• Chaptered: 6/15/15
• Enrolled: 6/17/15
• Passed: 7/2/15

Caption

An Act Concerning The Return Or Use Of Unused Grant Awards From The Department Of Economic And Community Development.

Impact

The impact of HB 5660 on state laws primarily lies in its establishment of a clearer framework for the return and use of unused grant funds. Grant recipients are given structured guidelines that will facilitate their planning for grant expenditures and allow for accounting transparency. The legislation reinforces the responsibility of grant recipients to adhere to established timelines, thereby enhancing fiscal responsibility and enabling the DECD to reclaim funds that are not utilized effectively. This change is expected to promote a more judicious use of state grants and improve financial oversight.

Summary

House Bill 5660, also known as Public Act No. 15-151, aims to streamline the management of unused grant awards provided by the Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD). The act mandates that any agreement for the award of a grant must include a designated date by which the grant recipient is required to either return the unused portion of the grant or apply for authorization to repurpose it for another eligible use. This legislative change is designed to ensure accountability and proper management of state funds while providing flexibility for grant recipients in how they utilize the funds.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally positive, especially among legislators who view it as a necessary step towards greater fiscal accountability and efficiency in managing state resources. Advocacy for responsible grant management is prevalent, and supporters believe this bill will contribute to more effective economic development initiatives. While no significant opposition was noted, some concerns about the implications for smaller organizations in terms of administrative burden may have been raised, but overall, the legislation was received without significant contention.

Contention

Notably, the main points of contention revolve around the practical implications for grant recipients, particularly smaller entities that may find compliance with these new requirements challenging. Questions of how stringent the enforcement of the return dates will be and whether sufficient support will be provided to assist grant recipients in adjusting to the new management requirements were raised during discussions. Nonetheless, the overall consensus leaned towards the bill being a positive reform for the grant management process in the state.