Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05708

Introduced
1/21/15  
Refer
1/21/15  
Refer
2/18/15  
Refer
2/18/15  
Report Pass
3/11/15  
Report Pass
3/11/15  
Refer
3/20/15  
Refer
3/20/15  
Report Pass
3/26/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Connecticut Transit Site In New Haven.

Impact

The passage of HB05708 is likely to have a significant impact on local governance powers and economic initiatives in New Haven. By allowing the city to acquire land specifically for public use and economic development projects, the bill aims to stimulate local economic activity and improve municipal services. However, the measure contains provisions that stipulate if the city fails to use the land for the intended purposes or relinquishes control, the land will revert back to state ownership, ensuring accountability in its use.

Summary

HB05708, titled 'An Act Concerning The Connecticut Transit Site In New Haven,' focuses on the conveyance of a specified parcel of land in New Haven from the state to the city. The bill stipulates that the Commissioner of Transportation, with the approval from the Commissioner of Economic and Community Development, is authorized to transfer a parcel of approximately 6.95 acres to New Haven at minimal administrative costs. This land is intended for municipal use including relocation of public service departments and fostering economic development.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this bill appears to be generally positive among those who support local development and improvements in municipal services. Advocates believe that transferring this land to New Haven can lead to better public service facilities and contribute to the overall economic vitality of the area. However, as with many land conveyance bills, there may be concerns from community members regarding the transparency of how the land will be utilized and the conditions tied to the reversion clause.

Contention

One notable point of contention involves the potential for the city not adhering to the intended use of the land, causing public fear of mismanagement or underutilization of the parcel. Critics may argue that the reversion clause could create instability for future municipal planning efforts, particularly in economic development initiatives that require a long-term commitment to land use. Balancing local control with state oversight will be a key issue as discussions on this bill progress.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.