Connecticut House Bill HB05710

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/15
• Refer: 1/21/15
• Refer: 2/18/15
• Report Pass: 3/11/15
• Refer: 3/20/15
• Report Pass: 3/26/15
• Refer: 4/14/15
• Report Pass: 4/20/15

Caption

An Act Authorizing The Commissioner Of Energy And Environmental Protection To Seek Enforcement Of Prohibitions Against Persons Encroaching On State-owned Open Space.

Impact

The bill would significantly strengthen the state's ability to safeguard open space areas from encroachment. By allowing DEEP to consult with the Attorney General before resolving or settling encroachment issues, the law ensures that any actions taken are not only reasonable and adequate but also aligned with the state's interest in maintaining ecological balance. This includes potentially referring cases involving criminal conduct for further legal action, thereby implying a more stringent enforcement regime.

Summary

House Bill 5710 seeks to empower the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) to enforce prohibitions against individuals encroaching on state-owned open space. This legislation is critical as it addresses the growing concerns regarding the unauthorized use and degradation of public lands meant for conservation. The bill amends existing statutes to facilitate a more structured approach to managing and restoring these invaluable natural spaces that belong to the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5710 appears to be largely positive among environmental advocates and agencies concerned with land conservation. Supporters argue that this legislative enhancement is necessary to combat encroachment effectively and preserve the state’s natural resources. There is a general acknowledgment that better enforcement measures are essential to discourage activities that threaten state-owned lands.

Contention

While the bill seems well-received by those prioritizing environmental protection, there may be contention regarding the balance between enforcement and public access to state-owned lands. Critics might express concerns about how stringent enforcement could limit recreational use or place additional burdens on local communities. However, the primary focus remains on ensuring the protection and integrity of open spaces, suggesting that any opposition may center more around implementation details rather than the bill's objectives.