Connecticut House Bill HB05879

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/15
• Refer: 1/21/15

Caption

An Act Increasing The Maximum Amount Of Property Tax Abatement For Local Volunteer Emergency Service Personnel.

Impact

The passage of HB 5879 would have significant implications for local governments and community emergency services. It would require municipalities to adjust their budgeting for property tax revenues to accommodate the increased abatement amount. As a result, while the bill provides greater financial incentive for volunteers, local budgets may experience strain as they balance these incentives with other fiscal responsibilities. Localities may need to explore additional funding sources to sustain their financial obligations, particularly if they rely heavily on local emergency services supported by volunteers.

Summary

House Bill 5879 proposes an amendment to the existing laws regarding property tax abatement for local volunteer emergency service personnel, particularly focusing on volunteer firefighters. The bill seeks to increase the maximum property tax abatement for these individuals from $1,000 to $1,250. This initiative reflects a recognition of the critical service provided by volunteer fire departments and aims to enhance the incentive for individuals to volunteer in such vital roles within their communities. By increasing the financial support afforded to these volunteers, the bill aims to both recognize their contributions and potentially encourage greater participation in emergency services.

Contention

While the bill generally enjoys bipartisan support due to its intent to bolster volunteer emergency services, there may be contention related to how local governments will absorb the financial impact of this increased abatement. Some officials might express concerns about the potential for budget shortfalls, especially in communities with limited financial resources. Additionally, discussions may arise around whether the increased amount adequately reflects the value and risks associated with volunteering in emergency services, or if the benefits could lead to dependency on local tax incentives rather than ensuring robust community support for these essential services.