Connecticut House Bill HB05924

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/15
• Refer: 1/21/15
• Refer: 3/16/15

Caption

An Act Concerning Late Submission Of Claims For Lottery Prizes.

Impact

If passed, HB 05924 will significantly impact those who participate in the lottery by offering a more lenient approach to claiming prizes. It specifically focuses on late submissions while ensuring that a percentage of the prize money is allocated towards the chronic gamblers treatment and rehabilitation account. This could enhance the support services available for gamblers, potentially addressing addiction and providing necessary resources to those in need.

Summary

House Bill 05924 seeks to amend the existing regulations concerning the submission of claims for lottery prizes in Connecticut. Specifically, it allows individuals who submit a late claim for a winning lottery ticket to still receive their prize under certain conditions. The proposed bill outlines that claims can be submitted within seventy-two hours after the typical deadline, accompanied by a filing fee of one hundred fifty dollars. This aims to provide an opportunity for potential winners who may have missed the original claim deadline to still access their winnings.

Sentiment

General sentiment related to the bill appears to be supportive, especially among representatives and groups focused on gambling addiction treatment. The encouraging perspective is rooted in the belief that the bill not only assists lottery winners who missed deadlines but also contributes to funding for treatment programs. However, there may also be dissent regarding the gambling aspects of the bill, particularly from those who believe that liberalizing access to late claims might promote irresponsible gambling behavior.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the fee required for late claims and the associated implications of taxpayer dollars used to administer these processes. Critics might argue that imposing a fee can be a barrier for individuals who may already be struggling financially due to gambling issues, while supporters may see it as a necessary measure to fund administrative costs and provide financial support for addiction services. The ongoing debate will likely address the balance between aiding winners and maintaining responsible gambling practices.