Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05957

Introduced
1/22/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Voting By The General Assembly On Collective Bargaining Agreements And Agreements And Stipulations In Connection With A Lawsuit.

Impact

If enacted, HB 05957 would fundamentally alter the oversight mechanism of collective bargaining agreements in Connecticut. The requirement for legislative approval signifies a shift from the previous system, where such agreements could often be settled without direct legislative intervention. This could result in more rigorous scrutiny of fiscal obligations incurred by the state through collective bargaining, potentially impacting negotiations between state employee unions and the government. The bill also aims to ensure that elected representatives directly participate in significant financial commitments stemming from lawsuits involving the state.

Summary

House Bill 05957, titled 'An Act Concerning Voting By The General Assembly On Collective Bargaining Agreements And Agreements And Stipulations In Connection With A Lawsuit', seeks to amend sections 5-278 and 3-125a of the general statutes to mandate that both chambers of the General Assembly must vote to approve or reject all collective bargaining agreements with state employee organizations, as well as any agreements or stipulations linked to lawsuits. This bill intends to increase transparency and legislative oversight over agreements that may have significant implications for state budgeting and employee relations.

Contention

Notably, this bill may spark contention between legislative bodies and state employee organizations. Proponents argue that requiring General Assembly votes will foster accountability and greater representation of public interests. However, critics may contend that this requirement could impede the negotiation process and lead to delays in reaching agreements, thus affecting state employees' benefits and working conditions. Additionally, it may raise concerns regarding legislative overreach into processes traditionally managed by executive agencies and negotiated through collective bargaining.

Notable_points

The proposed amendments also accentuate the relationship between legislative actions and collective bargaining processes, highlighting the role of lawmakers in matters that can affect thousands of employees. By stating that both chambers must vote on these agreements, the bill underscores a commitment to democratic principles and ensures that all political representatives can voice their positions on significant agreements related to state employment and fiscal responsibilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00411

An Act Concerning Temporary State Employees And Collective Bargaining.

CT SB00201

An Act Concerning Unfair Real Estate Listing Agreements And The Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act.

CT HR00015

Resolution Proposing Approval Of An Agreement Between The State Of Connecticut And The State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition (sebac).

CT SR00012

Resolution Proposing Approval Of An Agreement Between The State Of Connecticut And The State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition (sebac).

CT HB05269

An Act Concerning Noncompete Agreements.

CT SB00001

An Act Concerning The Health And Safety Of Connecticut Residents.

CT HB05007

An Act Concerning The Transportation Allowance For Members And Members-elect Of The General Assembly.

CT SB00361

An Act Concerning The Impermissible Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements In The Workplace.

CT HB05090

An Act Concerning Funding For Training Law Enforcement Officers.

CT SB00004

An Act Concerning Victims Of Domestic Violence, The Unsolicited Transmission Of Intimate Images By Means Of An Electronic Communication Device And The Impermissible Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements In The Workplace.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.