Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06151

Introduced
1/22/15  
Introduced
1/22/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Privatizing The Delivery Of Social Services.

Impact

If enacted, this bill could significantly alter the landscape of state-provided social services by shifting a substantial portion of service delivery to nonprofit entities. Proponents argue that this move could streamline services, reduce bureaucracy, and leverage the efficiency often attributed to nonprofit organizations. There is a growing belief that nonprofits can engage with communities more effectively, leading to innovative and targeted service delivery. However, this raises important questions about oversight and accountability, particularly regarding the potential for varying standards of care and access to services across different regions

Summary

House Bill 06151 proposes an evaluation of the feasibility, efficacy, and cost efficiency of privatizing the delivery of social services currently provided by the state. Introduced by Representative Betts, the bill aims to require the Commissioner of Social Services, alongside the Commissioners of Developmental Services and Mental Health and Addiction Services, to assess whether transferring 50% of these services to nonprofit organizations could result in higher quality at reduced costs for the state. This initiative reflects ongoing discussions surrounding the best methods to deliver essential public services more effectively.

Contention

The bill may face contention from those wary of privatization's implications, stressing the importance of maintaining state oversight to ensure quality and equity in service provision. Concerns may arise regarding the capacity of nonprofit organizations to handle sensitive social service functions, particularly in areas like mental health and developmental services. Critics might argue that shifting services away from the state could lead to underfunding or inconsistencies in service delivery, potentially widening the gap for vulnerable populations. Debate on this bill would likely hinge on the balance between cost savings and the quality of services delivered.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.