Connecticut House Bill HB06221

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/15
• Refer: 1/22/15

Caption

An Act Concerning Limitations On An Attorney's Ability To Articulate In Lump Sums Or Mathematical Formulae The Amount Of Past And Future Noneconomic Damages Claimed To Be Recoverable.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6221 would primarily impact how legal practitioners approach the presentation of damages in civil cases. This change could lead to more uniformity in how noneconomic damages are articulated in court, potentially enhancing the fairness of jury deliberations. The bill reflects a shift towards reducing the influence of numerical expressions in potentially inflating or diminishing jurors' perceptions of compensation, thereby aiming to lead to more reasonable awards based on the merits of each case instead of persuasive numerical advocacy.

Summary

House Bill 6221 aims to amend the statute regarding how attorneys may present claims for noneconomic damages during court proceedings, particularly during closing arguments. The bill specifically prohibits attorneys from articulating these damages as lump sums or through mathematical formulas, which seeks to alter the way juries understand and interpret damage claims. The intention behind this measure is to prevent potential bias that could arise from presenting financial figures in such a manner, thereby promoting a more balanced consideration by jurors concerning noneconomic damages like pain and suffering.

Contention

Notably, the bill may face objections from certain legal advocates who argue that the ability to express damages using lump sums or formulas often provides clarity and conveys the gravity of the claims to jurors. Critics might contend that this amendment could inhibit the attorneys’ ability to effectively relay their arguments and may result in jurors underestimating the severity of noneconomic damages due to a lack of compelling financial context. The discussions surrounding the bill could reveal a broader debate about the nature of legal arguments in personal injury and civil liability cases.