Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06383

Introduced
1/22/15  
Introduced
1/22/15  
Refer
1/22/15  
Refer
1/22/15  
Refer
3/5/15  
Refer
3/5/15  
Report Pass
3/5/15  
Report Pass
3/5/15  
Refer
3/13/15  
Refer
3/13/15  
Report Pass
3/19/15  
Report Pass
3/19/15  
Refer
3/24/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Medical Costs Of Certain Veteran Amputees.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6383 would significantly influence how medical costs are managed for veterans, particularly those who are amputees. The state would take on additional financial responsibilities to provide services that may not be fully covered by federal provisions, thereby potentially increasing accessibility to necessary healthcare resources for affected individuals. This change could lead to improved healthcare outcomes for veterans in Connecticut, enabling them to better manage the long-term effects of their service-related injuries.

Summary

House Bill 6383 aims to address the medical costs incurred by veterans who have lost limbs while serving in the military. Specifically, the bill mandates that the Department of Veterans' Affairs will cover the expenses related to medical services and equipment required due to the amputation of an arm or leg, beyond what is already provided by the federal Department of Veterans Affairs. This legislative measure reflects a recognition of the sacrifices made by veterans and seeks to ensure they receive adequate medical support for their injuries.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6383 appears to be largely positive, with widespread support for initiatives that improve the welfare of veterans. Stakeholders and advocates for veteran affairs are expected to favor this bill as it aligns with broader goals of providing comprehensive support for service members post-deployment. Overall, there seems to be a consensus that enhancing medical assistance for veterans, particularly amputees, is both a moral obligation and a public good.

Contention

While there is strong support for HB 6383, potential points of contention could arise concerning the funding and resource allocation required by the state to implement this bill effectively. Questions may also be raised regarding the extent of coverage and the criteria for determining which medical services and equipment are eligible under this new provision. Balancing state resources with the needs of veterans may become a critical topic of discussion during the legislative process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.