Connecticut House Bill HB06397

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/15
• Refer: 1/23/15
• Report Pass: 3/5/15
• Refer: 3/13/15
• Report Pass: 3/19/15
• Refer: 3/24/15

Caption

An Act Concerning Retroactive Medicaid For Home-care Clients.

Impact

The impact of HB 6397 can be significant on state laws governing Medicaid services. By allowing retroactive payments, the bill seeks to reduce the financial burden on home-care clients and their families. With these provisions, individuals may not have to wait for months to receive needed assistance, thus improving access to care and ensuring that eligible parties receive the benefits they are entitled to without delays associated with the application process.

Summary

House Bill 6397, titled 'An Act Concerning Retroactive Medicaid for Home-Care Clients,' aims to reform the way Medicaid provides services to eligible individuals seeking home care. The legislation mandates that individuals who apply for medical assistance under Medicaid may be eligible for retroactive benefits, covering costs incurred up to three months prior to their application date, provided there are no prohibited asset transfers made in the preceding 60 months. This could greatly aid many in receiving financial support for home care when faced with sudden health-related needs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally positive among proponents, particularly advocates for elderly care and healthcare reform. Supporters argue that this bill is crucial for supporting those who might not have the financial means to cover immediate home care expenses during a health crisis. However, there may be concerns from some groups about the potential financial implications for state Medicaid programs and whether these retroactive payments could lead to increased state expenditures.

Contention

Notably, contention may arise around the implications of allowing retroactive payments, specifically regarding asset transfers. There is a threshold stipulating that applicants must not have transferred assets for less than fair market value within 60 months prior to their application. Critics may argue this provision could complicate the application process or inadvertently penalize individuals who were unaware of the rules surrounding asset transfers, thus leading to debates on the fairness and accessibility of Medicaid for those in need.