| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 6668 | |
| 2 | 2 | January Session, 2015 LCO No. 3102 | |
| 3 | 3 | *03102* | |
| 4 | 4 | Referred to Committee on EDUCATION | |
| 5 | 5 | Introduced by: | |
| 6 | 6 | REP. GENGA, 10th Dist. REP. CURREY, 11th Dist. SEN. LARSON, 3rd Dist. REP. ROJAS, 9th Dist. | |
| 7 | 7 | ||
| 8 | 8 | General Assembly | |
| 9 | 9 | ||
| 10 | 10 | Proposed Bill No. 6668 | |
| 11 | 11 | ||
| 12 | 12 | January Session, 2015 | |
| 13 | 13 | ||
| 14 | 14 | LCO No. 3102 | |
| 15 | 15 | ||
| 16 | 16 | *03102* | |
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | 18 | Referred to Committee on EDUCATION | |
| 19 | 19 | ||
| 20 | 20 | Introduced by: | |
| 21 | 21 | ||
| 22 | 22 | REP. GENGA, 10th Dist. | |
| 23 | 23 | ||
| 24 | 24 | REP. CURREY, 11th Dist. | |
| 25 | 25 | ||
| 26 | 26 | SEN. LARSON, 3rd Dist. | |
| 27 | 27 | ||
| 28 | 28 | REP. ROJAS, 9th Dist. | |
| 29 | 29 | ||
| 30 | 30 | AN ACT REDUCING THE COST OF MAGNET SCHOOL TUITION FOR CERTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICTS. | |
| 31 | 31 | ||
| 32 | 32 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: | |
| 33 | 33 | ||
| 34 | 34 | That section 10-264l of the general statutes be amended to permit any local or regional board of education located in the Sheff region, as defined in subsection (k) of section 10-264l of the general statutes, except for the Hartford school district, that has greater than five per cent of its resident students, as defined in section 10-262f of the general statutes, enrolled in an interdistrict magnet school program to not be financially responsible for the portion of the per student tuition charged in excess of such five per cent and that the Department of Education shall be financially responsible for such excess per student tuition. | |
| 35 | 35 | ||
| 36 | 36 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 37 | 37 | ||
| 38 | 38 | To provide relief to certain school districts for the costs associated with magnet school tuition. |