Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06775

Introduced
2/11/15  
Introduced
2/11/15  
Refer
2/11/15  
Report Pass
3/10/15  
Refer
3/19/15  
Refer
3/19/15  
Report Pass
3/25/15  
Refer
3/31/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Payment Of The Costs Of Certification For A Police Officer.

Impact

If enacted, the bill establishes a structured reimbursement policy for police certification that shifts some financial responsibility among law enforcement units. This could potentially relieve financial burdens on units that train officers, fostering more consistent training practices across the state as units may be incentivized to retain certified officers. The bill also brings clarity to the financial obligations of law enforcement units employing certified officers, which may help in budgeting and resource allocation within departments.

Summary

House Bill 06775 aims to address the financial responsibilities associated with the certification of police officers. Specifically, it mandates that when a police officer, certified while employed by one law enforcement unit, is subsequently hired by a different unit within four years of obtaining that certification, the new hiring unit must reimburse the initial unit for the costs incurred in the officer's certification. This reimbursement system is tiered, where the amount decreases based on the time elapsed since certification until the four-year mark.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 06775 is largely supportive from within law enforcement circles, as it aligns incentives for retaining officers and ensures a level of financial fairness among law enforcement agencies. However, there are also concerns about the implications of such reimbursement requirements on smaller or less funded departments, which may struggle more than larger units in absorbing the costs associated with training and certification.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from those advocating for reform in police funding and operations, who argue that the bill could disproportionately impact smaller departments that rely heavily on limited budgets. Critics may also express worries that incentivizing officer movement between various units could lead to staffing instability, mismatched qualifications, or the prioritization of certain departments over others in terms of funding and training resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.